中国农业气象 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (01): 1-12.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2021.01.001

• 农业气候资源与气候变化栏目 •    下一篇

采样深度和计算方法影响保护性耕作土壤碳氮储量的评估结果

高奇奇,张玮,马立晓,任图生,张爱平,李贵春,胡正江,杜章留   

  1. 1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所,北京 100081;2. 中国农业大学土地科学与技术学院 北京 100193;3.中国农业大学桓台实验站,山东桓台 256400;4. 中国农业大学资源与环境学院,北京 100193
  • 收稿日期:2020-08-06 出版日期:2021-01-20 发布日期:2021-01-17
  • 通讯作者: 杜章留,研究员,研究方向为土壤有机质稳定过程及其调控,生物炭农用效应与作用机理,E-mail: duzlsd@163.com E-mail:duzlsd@163.com
  • 作者简介:高奇奇,E-mail: gaoqiqi06@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金面上项目(41671305)

Estimation of Soil Organic Carbon and Total Nitrogen Storages under Conservation Tillage as Influenced by Sampling Depths and Calculation Methods

GAO Qi-qi, ZHANG Wei, MA Li-xiao, REN Tu-sheng, ZHANG Ai-ping, LI Gui-chun, HU Zheng-jiang, DU Zhang-liu   

  1. 1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081, China; 2. College of Land Science and Technology, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193; 3. Huantai Agroecosystem Experimental Station of China Agricultural University, Huantai, Shandong 256400; 4. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193
  • Received:2020-08-06 Online:2021-01-20 Published:2021-01-17

摘要: 为探讨不同年限耕作措施下土壤有机碳(SOC)和全氮(TN)在土壤剖面中的分布和累积特征,了解采样深度和计算方法对SOC和TN储量评估结果的影响,基于山东桓台(5a)和河北栾城(17a)耕作定位试验,设置翻耕(CT)、旋耕(RT)和免耕(NT)三个处理(秸秆均还田),分析土壤剖面中(桓台60cm;栾城50cm)土壤容重(b)、SOC和TN浓度的分布特征,并比较不同土层深度下“固定深度法(FD)”和“等效重量法(ESM)”所计算SOC和TN储量的差异。结果表明,连续多年保护性耕作后,NT处理较CT促进了SOC和TN储量在表层积累,增加了SOC和TN浓度的层化比率(SR)值。在山东桓台试验点,NT处理较CT显著增加了0−5cm土层SOC和TN储量(P<0.05),增幅分别为29%和30%,而整个土壤剖面(0−60cm)的碳氮储量分别降低8%和10%。河北栾城试验点,0−10cm土层NT和RT处理较CT分别增加SOC储量10%和14%,但在≥20cm剖面中不同耕作处理之间的碳氮储量无显著差异。由于各处理之间b的差异,传统FD法高估了山东桓台免耕处理SOC和TN储量,但低估了河北栾城碳氮储量。因此,为准确评估不同耕作措施下土壤碳氮固持效应,推荐在“深层采样”(≥30cm)策略基础上,利用ESM法计算其储量。保护性耕作对改善土壤质量有积极作用,但其通过土壤碳截留以缓解气候变化的潜力不应该被高估。

关键词: 保护性耕作, 土壤有机碳, 全氮, 固定深度法, 等效重量法

Abstract: The objectives of this study were to investigate the profile distribution and accumulation characteristics of soil organic carbon (SOC) and total nitrogen (TN) under different tillage treatments, and further to compare the effects of sampling depths and calculation methods on the evaluation of SOC and TN storages. Two field experiments were established at the Shandong Huantai (5 years) and Hebei Luancheng (17 years) sites. The experiments included three tillage treatments (with residue): conventional tillage (CT), rotary tillage (RT) and no-tillage (NT). Soil samples were collected down to 60 and 50cm depths at Huantai and Luancheng site respectively. Soil bulk density (b) and the distribution of SOC and TN concentrations were determined. The SOC and TN storages were calculated by the fixed depth (FD) and equivalent soil mass (ESM) methods. The results showed that soil depth significantly affected the soil b, the concentrations and storages of SOC and TN (P<0.001). Compared with CT, NT enhanced SOC and TN storages in the top layer, and increased the stratification ratio (SR) of SOC and TN concentrations, though the SR value of SOC at Luancheng site was not significant. RT (cf. CT) increased the storages of SOC and TN in the top layer and the SR value of TN concentration at the Luancheng site. Specifically, at the Huantai site, the SOC and TN storages under NT were 29% and 30% higher than that of CT in the 0−5cm soil layer (P<0.05), but were 8% and 10% lower in the 0−60cm soil profile. At the Luancheng site, the SOC storage in the NT and RT was higher by 10% and 14% than CT; but there was no significant differences in SOC and TN storages between tillage treatments in the deeper profiles (i.e., ≥20cm). Due to the varied soil b between the treatments in the surface layer, the FD method overestimated the SOC and TN storages in the NT soil at the Huantai site, but underestimated them at the Luancheng site. Therefore, to accurately assess the SOC sequestration induced by tillage conversion, the ESM instead of FD method was recommended to calculate SOC storages together with the "deeper sampling" strategy (≥30cm). Our study implicates that although conservation tillage has positive effect on soil quality, the potential for mitigating climate change through SOC sequestration should not be overestimated.

Key words: Conservation tillage, Soil organic carbon, Total nitrogen, Fixed depth, Equivalent soil mass