下限温度对北京樱花盛花始期模拟效果的影响

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2018.01.001

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 利用实际物候观测资料，通过人为设定不同生长发育下限温度值，比较不同指标对应发育阶段所需积温的稳定性和物候模拟准确率，是鉴定植物生长发育下限温度指标的常用统计方法。利用1998-2014年北京市海淀区玉渊潭公园樱花盛花始期观测资料，在设定下限温度0.0～5.0℃范围内，以0.1℃为步长，分别统计历年1月1日-樱花盛花始期的阶段活动积温和有效积温，对比分析不同温度指标对两种模型阶段积温稳定性和发育期模拟准确率的影响。结果表明：（1）阶段积温随设定下限温度指标而变化，且阶段活动积温值及其年际变化值均大于有效积温；（2）两种积温的标准差以活动积温的标准差较大，表明采用有效积温测算樱花盛花始期的误差小于活动积温测算结果；阶段有效积温在设定下限温度0.0～2.9℃范围内变异系数较小，3.0℃及其以上时活动积温的变异系数小于有效积温，活动积温离散程度更小；（3）不同设定下限温度值的始花期预测结果，均以2～3℃的准确率较高。对应设定下限温度0.0～3.2℃范围，有效积温模拟始花期基本准确率（误差小于3d）和准确率（误差2d以内）均大于活动积温模拟结果，但设定下限温度＞3.8℃时结果相反。设定下限温度处于3.3～3.8℃时，有效积温模拟误差的基本准确率大于活动积温，误差小于2d准确率则低于活动积温。综上所述，无论活动积温还是有效积温，均以设定下限温度2.0～3.5℃的计算结果标准差和变异系数最小，准确率较高，在未进行生理测定的条件下，可将其作为樱花盛花始期的下限温度指标。

关键词: 积温, 生长假设, 基点温度, 变异系数, 模拟准确率

Abstract: It is a commonly used statistical method to determine the base temperature index (Tb) of plant growth and development by comparing stability and prediction accuracy of stage growing degree days (GDD) calculated by different artificial given base temperature index using actual observed phenomena data.In this paper, active growing degree days (GDDA) and effective growing degree days (GDDE) from Jan. 1st to the beginning flowing date of Prunus discoidea were calculated by different given Tb in the range of 0.0-5.0 ℃ with step of 0.1℃ using the observed data during 1998-2014 at Yuyuantan Park, Haidian District, Beijing. Effects of different given Tb on stability of two kinds GDD and simulated phenomena accuracy were also compared and analyzed. The results showed that: （1）stage GDD changes as Tb changes. GDDA and its inter-annual variability are both bigger than that of GDDE.（2）Both standard deviation (SD) and coefficient of variation (CV) of calculated GDDA or GDDE are smallest at the Tb range of 2.0-3.5℃, which could be the real Tb of Prunus discoidea determined by statistics under the condition without physiological experiment. SD of GDDA is bigger than that of GDDE, suggested that error of the beginning flowing date estimated by GDDE is smaller than that by GDDA. As an index of relative discrete degree, CV of GDDE calculation is smaller than that of GDDA in the Tb range of 0.0-2.9℃ but is bigger if Tb ≥3.0℃.（3）Comparing estimated beginning flowing dates of different given Tb, the accuracy is highest in the range of 2-3℃. In the range of 0.0-3.2℃, both basic accuracy (error＜3days) and accuracy (error＜2days) of the simulated date by GDDE is better than that by GDDA, but is opposite when Tb＞3.8℃.In the range of 3.3-3.8℃, basic accuracy estimated by GDDE is better than that of GDDA, but accuracy is opposite.

Key words: Growing degree-days, Growth and developmental assumption, Base temperature, Coefficient of variation, Simulation accuracy

叶彩华，周孝煌，姜会飞，姜少杰，张玉莹，张子源，李超. 下限温度对北京樱花盛花始期模拟效果的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2018, 39(01): 1-8.

YE Cai-hua, ZHOU Xiao-huang, JIANG Hui-fei, JIANG Shao-jie, ZHANG Yu-ying, ZHANG Zi-yuan, LI Chao. Impacts of Different Base Temperature on Simulation Effect of Beginning Flowering Date of Prunus discoidea in Beijing[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2018, 39(01): 1-8.

参考文献

[1]吴玉洁,叶彩华,姜会飞,等.不同积温计算方法作物发育期模拟效果比较[J].中国农业大学学报,2016,21(10): 117-126. Wu Y G,Ye C H,Jiang H F.Comparison of the simulation effect of different growing degree-days calculating methods on crop development processes[J].Journal of China Agricultural University, 2016,21(10): 117-126.(in Chinese) [2]姜会飞,温德永.基于线性生长假设利用极端温度计算日积温的方法[J].中国农业大学学报,2013,18(1):82-87. Jiang H F,Wen D Y.Methods of calculating growing degree-day based on LR assumption and daily extreme temperatures[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2013,18(1):82-87.(in Chinese) [3]Mcmaster G S,Wilhelm W W,Palic D B,et al.Spring wheat leaf appearance and temperature:extending the paradigm[J]. Annals of Botany,2003,91(6):697-705. [4]Theodore C H,Lee H,Pasquale S,et al.AquaCrop:the FAO cropmodel to simulate yield response to water III:parameterization and testing for maize[J].Agronomy Journal,2009,101:448-459. [5]Aiken R M.Applying thermal time scales to sunflower development [J].Agronomy Journal,2005, 97:746-754. [6]Mcmaster G S,White J W,Hunt L A,et al.Simulating the influence of vernalization,photoperiod and optimum temperature on wheat developmental rates[J].Annals of Botany,2008,102: 561-569. [7]姜会飞,温德永.基于优化生长假设利用极端温度计算日积温的方法[J].中国农业大学学报,2013,(2):116-123. Jiang H F,Wen D Y.Methods of calculating growing degree-day based on OR assumption and daily extreme temperatures[J]. Journal of China Agricultural University,2013,(2):116-123.(in Chinese) [8]Mcmaster G S,Wilhelm W W.Growing degree-days:one equation, two interpretations[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 1997,87(4):291-300. [9]康西言,董航宇,姚树然.基于气象因子的冬小麦发育期预报模型[J].中国农业气象,2015,36(4):465-471. Kang X Y,Dong H Y,Yao S R.Prediction model of winter wheat development stages based on meteorological factors[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology,2015,36(4):465-471.(in Chinese) [10]Jenni S,Bourgeois G,Laurence H,et al.Improving the prediction of processing bean maturity based on the growing degree day approach[J].Hortscience A Publication of the American Society for Horticultural Science,2000,35(4):611-614. [11]Moreno L S B,Pedreira C G S,Boote K J,et al.Base temperature determination of tropical Panicum spp.grasses and its effects on degree-day-based models[J].Agricultural and Forest Meteorology, 2014,186:26-33. [12]姜会飞.农业气象学(第二版)[M].北京:科学出版社, 2013: 70-71. Jiang H F.Agrometeorology (second edition)[M].Beijing: Science Press,2013:70-71.(in Chinese) [13]Porter J R,Gawith M.Temperatures and the growth and development of wheat:a review[J]. European Journal of Agronomy,1999,10(1):23-36. [14]Vinocur M G,Ritchie J T.Maize leaf development biases caused by air-apex temperature difference[J].Agronomy Journal, 2001,(93):767-772. [15]王晓霞,冯雪菲,张富荣.朝阳地区近50年生长季小麦有效积温变化特征分析[J].中国农学通报,2014,30(2):280-285. Wang X X,Feng X F,Zhang F R.Variation characteristic of effective accumulated temperature during wheat growth season in Chaoyang area in recent 50 years[J].Chinese Agricultural Science Bulletin,2014,30(2):280-285.(in Chinese) [16]Tian Z,Zhong H L,Sun L X,et al.Improving performance of Agro-ecological zone(AEZ) modeling by cross-scale model coupling:an application to Japonica rice production in Northeast China[J].Ecological Modelling,2014,290:155-164. [17]Bocchiola D,Nana E,Soncini A.Impact of climate change scenarios on crop yield and water footprint of maize in the Po valley of Italy[J].Agricultural Water Management,2013, 116:50-61. [18]Herrmann A,Kornher A,Taube F.A new harvest time prognosis tool for forage maize production in Germany[J]. Agricultural and Forest Meteorology,2005,130: 95-111. [19]张爱英,王焕炯,戴君虎,等.物候模型在北京观赏植物开花期预测中的适用性[J].应用气象学报,2014,25(4):483-492. Zhang A Y,Wang H J,Dai J H,et al.Applicability analysis of phonological models in the flowering time prediction of ornamental plants in Beijing area[J].Journal of Applied Meteorological Science,2014,25(4):483-492.(in Chinese) [20]张爱英,张建华,高迎新,等.SW物候模型在北京樱花盛花始期预测中的应用[J].气象科技,2015,43(2):309-313. Zhang A Y,Zhang J H,Gao Y X,et al.Prediction of first flowering date of Prunus discoidea in Beijing Yuyuantan Park using phonological model[J].Meteorological Science and Technology, 2015,43(2):309-313.(in Chinese) [21]Rodriguez-Rajo F J,Frenguelli G,Jato M V.Effect of air temperature on forecasting the start of the Betula pollen season at two contrasting sites in the south of Europe (1995-2001) [J].International Journal of Biometeorology, 2003,47: 117-125. [22]喻莎,陆魁东,谢佰承,等.高温时数和热积温对超级早稻结实率的影响[J].中国农业气象,2016,37(4):454-463. Yu S,Lu K D,Xie B C,et al.Effects of high temperature hours and thermal accumulated temperature on seed setting rate of super hybrid rice[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2016,37(4):454-463.(in Chinese)