中国农业气象 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 351-363.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2021.05.001

• 农业气候资源与气候变化栏目 •    下一篇

CMIP5全球气候模式统计降尺度数据对辽宁省极端气温模拟能力评估

庞静漪,刘布春,刘园,邱美娟,王珂依   

  1. 1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/作物高效用水与抗灾减损国家工程实验室/农业部农业环境重点实验室,北京 100081;2. 辽宁省营口市气象局,营口 115001
  • 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘布春,研究员,从事农业气象及灾害风险评估研究,E-mail:liubuchun@caas.cn E-mail:liubuchun@caas.cn
  • 作者简介:庞静漪,E-mail:464040668@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“重大自然灾害监测预警与防范”重点专项(2017YFC1502804)

Evaluation of the Ability of Statistical Downscaling Dataset from the CMIP5 Global Climate Models to Extreme Temperature Indices over Liaoning Province

PANG Jing-yi, LIU Bu-chun, LIU Yuan, QIU Mei-juan, WANG Ke-yi   

  1. 1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, CAAS/National Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Crop Water Use and Disaster Reduction/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Yingkou Meteorological Bureau, Yingkou Liaoning, 115001
  • Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-16

摘要: 利用1971−2010年辽宁地区32个气象台站观测资料,采用SS指标和M2指标,评估CMIP5气候预估降尺度数据集中31个模式对辽宁省全年和4个季节极端气温指数时空变化特征的模拟能力,并经MR综合评级,筛选模拟效果最好的模式。极端温度指数选用平均最高气温(TXm)、平均最低气温(TNm)、霜冻日数(FD0)、夏日日数(SU25)、最低气温极小值(TNn)、最高气温极大值(TXx)和极端气温范围(ETR)。结果表明:对单一极端气温指数而言,所有模式对表征气温平均特征的指数模拟效果较好,对表征连续极端气温事件的指数模拟效果一般,而对气温的极端特征模拟能力不足。由于模式对全年、各季节各极端气温指数的排名无一致性,引入MR评级指标进行排序,优选的3个模式为MPI-ESM-LR、GFDL-ESM2M和MIROC-ESM-CHEM。比较发现,优选模式集合平均结果相对于观测值的误差百分率整体上明显优于所有模式的集合平均结果,具有可用性。研究结果可为预估未来区域极端气温提供理论参考,建立的逐日模式资料可为开展辽宁农业气象灾害风险相关研究提供数据支撑。

关键词: CMIP5气候预估降尺度数据集, 辽宁, 极端气温指数, 模式评估, 优选模式

Abstract: Liaoning Province is one of the main grape production areas in China. Due to the increasing of temperature and the frequent occurrence of extreme temperature, it has a noticeable impact on the planting and production of grapes in Liaoning. Based on extreme temperature indices, Global Climate Models(GCM) are evaluated and the model with the best simulation effect in the study area are selected. It is helpful to improve the accuracy of future climate resource and disaster risk analysis. In this paper, the observation meteorological daily data during 1971−2010 was used, including 32 stations across Liaoning Province. 31 models in the CMIP5 climate downscaling dataset were assessed the simulation performance about the spatio-temporal variation characteristics of the extreme temperature indices in Liaoning Province (yearly and seasonally). And the locations of the meteorological stations were completely consistent with that of the model stations. After using SS/M2 indices and MR comprehensive rating, the best model was selected. Seven extreme temperature indices, including mean maximum temperature(TXm), mean minimum temperature(TNm), frost days(FD0), summer days (SU25), minimum minimum temperature(TNn), maximum maximum temperature(TXx) and the range of extreme temperatures(ETR), were adopted to investigate the change of extreme temperature. There were the following conclusions: for the indices representing the characteristics of mean temperature, the performance of all models were better and closest to the observed values; For the indices representing continuous extreme temperature events, the simulated results of all models were ordinary; And for indices representing extreme temperature, the simulation results were very different from the observation values. Since there was no consistency in the ranking of extreme temperature indices among the different time and space scales, the three models with the best simulation ability were MPI-ESM-LR, GFDL-ESM2M and MIROC-ESM-Chem introduced by MR index. The three models were the first choice in this paper. Comparing the error, the results of the preferred model ensemble averages were significantly better than that of others. It is helpful to use the selected models to predict the future change of agricultural climate resources and to analyze disaster risks across Liaoning Province. It can help seek advantages and avoid disadvantages and reduce disaster losses.

Key words: Climate downscaling dataset from CMIP5, Liaoning, Extreme temperature index, Model evaluation, Optimal selection models