中国农业气象 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (04): 305-316.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2023.04.005

• 农业气象灾害 栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

河北省苹果大风灾害风险评估

孙玉龙,景华,孙擎,李婷,魏铁鑫,高珊珊,余焰文   

  1. 1.河北省气象灾害防御和环境气象中心,石家庄 050021;2.中国气象科学研究院,北京 100081;3.河北省气象技术装备中心,石家庄 050021;4.江西省抚州市气象局,抚州 344199
  • 收稿日期:2022-04-01 出版日期:2023-04-20 发布日期:2023-04-15
  • 通讯作者: 景华,高级工程师,主要从事气象灾害风险研究,E-mail:996189732@qq.com E-mail:996189732@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    环渤海区域科技协同创新基金项目(QYXM201803);国家重点研发计划(2022YFD2300204);中国气象局创新发展专项(CXFZ2023J057)

Wind Disaster Risk Assessment of Apple in Hebei Province

SUN Yu-long, JING Hua, SUN Qing, LI Ting, WEI Tie-xin, GAO Shan-shan, YU Yan-wen   

  1. 1. Hebei Meteorological Disaster Prevention And Environmental Meteorology Center, Shijiazhuang 050021, China; 2. Chinese Academy of Meteorological Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3. Hebei Provincial Meteorological Technical Equipment Center, Shijiazhuang 050021; 4. Fuzhou Meteorological Service, Jiangxi Province, Fuzhou 344199
  • Received:2022-04-01 Online:2023-04-20 Published:2023-04-15

摘要: 基于长时间序列的河北省142个国家级气象台站大风观测数据、历史苹果大风灾情统计资料、苹果生育期等数据,选择最优机器学习模型延长极大风速时间序列,利用对应站点的极大风速和灾情统计数据确定苹果两个主要生育期内不同等级大风灾害气象指标阈值,分析了苹果大风灾害时空分布特征,对苹果大风灾害的危险性、脆弱性、暴露度和防灾减灾能力等指标进行综合风险评估。结果表明:随机森林模型模拟精度较高,可以较好地延长极大风速时间序列;苹果花期−幼果期的大风灾害阈值为极大风速≥9.1m·s−1,果实膨大-成熟期为极大风速≥7.9m·s−1,并进一步划分了不同等级大风灾害等级,验证结果与历史记录有较高的一致性;苹果大风灾害每年发生次数呈先降后升的趋势,河北省西北部和沧州市东部大风灾害发生频次较高;苹果大风灾害较高和高风险区域较为分散,约占全省面积的20%,主要分布在张家口市东部、承德市东南部、衡水市中部和石家庄市东部等地。

关键词: 苹果, 大风灾害, 机器学习, 风险评估

Abstract: Long-term wind observation data from 142 meteorological stations, historical apple wind disaster data, apple growth stages data, etc. were used in this study. Firstly, the optimal machine learning model has been built to extend long-term extreme wind speed. Then the thresholds of different levels of wind disasters in different apple growth stages were determined. The spatial-temporal distribution characteristics and a comprehensive risk assessment of apple wind disasters were carried out. The results showed that the random forest model had the highest accuracy and showed good performance in extending the extreme wind speed time series which is suitable for Hebei province. The thresholds of apple wind disasters were extreme wind speed≥9.1m·s−1 in flowering to fruit set, and extreme wind speed≥7.9m·s−1 in fruit development to mature. Furthermore, 4 levels of wind disasters in different apple growth stages were determined and the validation were in good agreement with the historical records. The overall trends of apple wind disasters were first decreasing and then increasing. In the northwest Hebei province and eastern Cangzhou, the frequencies of wind disasters were higher than in other regions. The high and the severe comprehensive risk areas of apple wind disaster were scattered which accounted for nearly 20% of Hebei and mainly in eastern Zhangjiakou, southeast Hengshui, middle Hengshui, and eastern Shijiazhuang.

Key words: Apple, Wind disasters, Machine learning, Risk assessment