中国农业气象 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (10): 876-888.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2023.10.002

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

几种分离方法在区域经济作物产量预测上的适用性分析:以吴中区枇杷为例

陶正达,赵静娴,顾荆奕,郑俊华,王俊,汤小红,陈洪良,杨大强   

  1. 1.苏州市吴中区气象局,苏州 215128;2.苏州市吴中区东山多种经营服务公司,苏州 215107;3.苏州市吴中区东山镇农林服务站,苏州 215107
  • 收稿日期:2022-12-19 出版日期:2023-10-20 发布日期:2023-10-11
  • 通讯作者: 赵静娴,硕士,工程师,主要研究方向为气象为农服务。 E-mail:1003635781@qq.com
  • 作者简介:陶正达,E-mail:15996370014@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏现代农业产业技术体系建设项目实施方案[JARS(2021)121];苏州市吴中区农业干旱识别及危险性评估(SZKJ202007)

TAO Zheng-da, ZHAO Jing-xian, GU Jing-yi, ZHENG Jun-hua, WANG Jun, TANG Xiao-hong, CHEN Hong-liang, YANG Da-qiang   

  1. 1. Wuzhong District Meteorological Bureau, Suzhou 215128, China; 2. Dongshan Diversified Service Company of Wuzhong , Suzhou 215107; 3. Dongshan Agriculture and Forestry Service Station of Wuzhong, Suzhou 215107
  • Received:2022-12-19 Online:2023-10-20 Published:2023-10-11

摘要: 以吴中区枇杷为研究对象,对比分析ARIMA模型、GM模型、线性趋势和二次指数平滑法在区域性经济作物上气象产量分离的适用性,并对在这四种方法的基础上所构建的基于气候因子的产量预测模型预测准确度进行分析。结果表明,(1)使用GM和线性趋势方法分离的枇杷气象产量的正负性与农业气象灾害年鉴匹配较好。(2)四种方法分离的枇杷气象产量与9个气候因子间复相关程度均达到极相关,复相关系数分别为ARIMA方法0.95,线性趋势和GM方法0.94,二次指数平滑方法0.93。(3)使用GM方法预测的枇杷趋势单产均方根误差和绝对百分比误差最大,在考虑了气候因子后,均方根误差降低百分率达到50.1%,其余三种方法中线性趋势法降低49.3%,ARIMA模型降低6.7%,二次指数平滑降低14.4%。(4)四种方法所构建的基于气候因子的产量预测模型预测结果,使用GM方法的RMSE和MAPE分别为3.0kg·hm−2和15.2%,线性趋势方法次之,ARIMA方法最差。整体来看,GM(1,1)和线性趋势方法分离的枇杷气象产量与气象灾害记录更匹配,使用GM方法构建的基于气候因子的产量预测模型效果最好,表明GM模型更适用于区域性经济作物的产量分离和预测。

关键词: 产量预测, 产量分离, ARIMA模型, 灰色模型, 二次指数平滑, 枇杷

Abstract: Four yield separation methods were used in this study to analyze the applicability on meteorological yield separation of regional cash crops, which are the ARIMA model, GM model, linear trend and quadratic exponential smoothing method. With the use of these four methods, the yield forecast models based on meteorological factor are built for analyzing the prediction accuracy. The results showed that the meteorological yield of loquat separated by GM model and linear trend method were well matched with the agrometeorological disaster records. The correlation coefficients between the meteorological yield of loquat separated by four methods and nine meteorological factors were high. The correlation coefficients were 0.95(separated by ARIMA), 0.94(separated by GM model and linear trend method) and 0.93(separated by quadratic exponential smoothing method). The root mean square error(RMSE) and the mean absolute percentage error(MAPE) between the loquat yield predicted by GM model and the actual yield were the largest, which was reduced by 50.1% after taking the meteorological factors into account. RMSE between the loquat yield predicted by linear trends, ARIMA model and secondary exponential smoothing methods and the actual yield was 49.3%, 16.7% and 14.4%. Comparing the four yield separation methods, the GM model significantly outperformed other methods, followed by the linear trend method. Moreover, the ARIMA model was the worst. The RMSE and the MAPE between the loquat yield predicted by GM model and the actual yield were 3.0kg·ha−1 and 15.2%. Overall, loquat meteorological yields separated by GM model and the linear trend method matched well with the agrometeorological disaster records. The GM model performed the best on loquat yield prediction, which shows that the GM model is more suitable for yield separation and prediction of regional cash crops.

Key words: Loquat production forecast, ARIMA model, GM model, Meteorological output