中国农业气象 ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (01): 91-100.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2024.01.009

• 农业气象灾害 栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

CMIP6全球气候模式对山东极端气温模拟能力评估

刘珊珊,刘布春,刘园,韩锐,杨凡,刘观止,车红蕾   

  1. 1.中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/作物高效用水与抗灾减损国家工程实验室/农业部农业环境重点实验室,北京 100081;2.新疆农业大学食品科学与药学学院,乌鲁木齐 830000;3.沈阳农业大学,沈阳 110866
  • 收稿日期:2023-03-03 出版日期:2024-01-20 发布日期:2024-01-15
  • 作者简介:刘珊珊,E-mail:liuss@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划“重大自然灾害监测预警与防范”重点专项(2017YFC1502804)

Assessment of Extreme Temperature Simulation Ability of CMIP6 Global Climate Model in Shandong Province

LIU Shan-shan, LIU Bu-chun, LIU Yuan, HAN Rui, YANG Fan, LIU Guan-zhi, CHE Hong-lei   

  1. 1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultral Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Crop Water Use and Disaster Reduction/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China; 2. College of Food Science and Pharmacy of Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830000; 3. Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
  • Received:2023-03-03 Online:2024-01-20 Published:2024-01-15

摘要: 利用Delta法统计降尺度处理第6次国际耦合模式比较计划(CMIP6)情景数据,基于中心化均方根误差(RMSE)、相关系数(R)、标准差(STD)和年际变率技巧评分(Ts),综合评估10个CMIP6模式的情景数据对山东极端气温指数的模拟能力,筛选模拟效果较好的气候模式。结果表明:对表征强度的极端气温指数TXx和TNx模拟中,在降尺度后有超过50%的模式模拟山东地区两个极端气温指数的绝对偏差中位数比降尺度前更接近观测值,对表征频次的极端气温指数TR、SU、FD和ID模拟中,有超过60%的模式绝对偏差中位数比降尺度前更接近观测值;使用等级排序法,比较10个模式的模拟能力得出,CMCC-ESM2得分为178分、NorESM2-MM得分为191分,TaiESM1得分为191分,将这3个模式作为优选模式;优选模式集合平均模拟各极端气温指数的误差百分率低于所有模式的集合平均,经优选后,指数TXx、TNx、TR和ID的误差百分率绝对值平均分别由4.2%、2.2%、28.67%和14.3%降至3.3%、1.8%、23.58%和9.7%,优选前后指数SU的误差百分率均在±1%内。

关键词: CMIP6, 模式评估, 极端气温指数, Delta降尺度方法, 山东

Abstract: The scenario data of Coupled Model Intercomparison Project Phase 6 (CMIP6) are processed by Delta method in statistical downscaling method.Based on the centralized root mean square error (RMSE), correlation coefficient (R), standard deviation (STD) and interannual variability skill score (Ts), comprehensively evaluate the simulation ability of scenario data from 10 CMIP6 models on the extreme temperature index in Shandong,and select models with better simulation results. The results indicate that:In the simulation of extreme temperature indices TXx and TNx that characterize intensity,after downscaling,more than 50% of the models simulate that the median absolute deviation of extreme temperature index in Shandong is closer to the observed value than before downscaling, in the simulation of extreme temperature indices TR, SU, FD and ID that characterize frequency,more than 60% of the models absolute deviation medians are closer to the observations than before downscaling.Using the ranking method, the simulation ability of the 10 models was compared.The CMCC-ESM2 score was 178 points, NorESM2-MM score was 191 points,and TaiESM1 score was 191 points.Therefore, these three models are preferred models. The error percentage of extreme temperature indices simulated by the ensemble mean of optimized models is lower than that of all models.After optimization,the absolute value of error percentage of TXx, TNx, TR and ID decreased from 4.2%, 2.2%, 28.67% and 14.3% to 3.3%, 1.8%, 23.58% and 9.7%, the error percentage of SU was within ± 1% before and after optimization.

Key words: CMIP6, Model evaluation, Extreme temperature index, Delta downscaling method, Shandong