中国农业气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 1085-1094.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2025.08.002

• 农业生态环境栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于哈尔滨CORS站网的水汽反演与降水量预测方法

王洪,刘伟龙,俞彬,谢慧铃,张嘉梁   

  1. 1.龙岩学院资源工程学院,龙岩 364012;2.福建省龙岩市气象局,龙岩 364012;3.中国矿业大学环境与测绘学院,徐州 221116;4.中国电建集团福建省电力勘测设计院有限公司,福州350001
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-16 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-08-19
  • 作者简介:王洪,E-mail:wanghong313@lyun.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金项目(2024J01309;2020J01356)

Water Vapor Inversion and Rainfall Prediction Method Based on Harbin CORS Station Network

WANG Hong, LIU Wei-long ,YU Bin, XIE Hui-ling, ZHANG Jia-liang   

  1. 1. School of Resource Engineering, Longyan University, Longyan 364012, China; 2.Meteorological Bureau of Longyan City, Longyan 364012; 3. School of Environment Science and Spatial Informatics, China University of Mining and Technology, Xuzhou 221116; 4. Power China Fujian Electric Power Engineerinig Co.,Ltd., Fuzhou 350001
  • Received:2024-12-16 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-19

摘要:

选取哈尔滨市202283次降事件为研究对象,基于该市连续运行参考站(CORS)提供的全球导航卫星系统GNSS原始观测数据,解算并反演大气可降水量(PWV通过IGRA2探空数据集,校准ERA5再分析数据集大气可降水量;利用校准后的ERA5 PWV检验GNSS PWV的反演精度;通过LSTM模型训练PWV分析PWV在降水过程的时序变化,为提高哈尔滨市极端降水事件的监测能力、灾前制订应对措施提供参考。结果表明:1)基于哈尔滨探空站数据校准,IGRA2 PWVERA5 PWV相关系数为0.99IGRA2 PWVERA5 PWV平均偏差为−0.91mm,标准差为2.01mm,均方根误差为2.20mm,表明ERA5再分析数据集在哈尔滨市具有较高的精度。(2GNSS PWVERA5 PWV差值总体在±4.00mm之间,平均偏差最大值为−0.19mm,标准差最大值为1.51mm,均方根误差最大值为1.52mm,表明GNSS反演PWV具有较高的准确性。(3)基于GNSS反演的PWV值作为训练数据源,构建的LSTM模型训练集均方根误差为0.73mm,表明GNSS PWV训练LSTM模型的效果较好。(4LSTM PWVGNSS PWV差值在降水事件发生前12h总体维持在±5.00mm,随预测步长从12h递增至24h两者的差值也逐渐增至±20mm通过LSTM模型预测PWV的变化趋势,对降水事件进行12h短期预测的方法是可行的。

关键词: GNSS, 大气可降水量, ERA5再分析数据集, LSTM模型

Abstract:

Three precipitation events in August 2022 in Harbin were selected as the research objects, and the atmospheric precipitable water (PWV) was calculated and retrieved based on the original GNSS observation data provided by the city's continuous operation reference station (CORS). The atmospheric precipitable water of ERA5 reanalysis dataset was calibrated using IGRA2 sounding dataset. The calibration ERA5 PWV was used to verify the inversion accuracy of GNSS PWV. The LSTM model was used to train PWV and analyze the temporal variability of PWV during the precipitation process to provide a reference for improving the monitoring ability of extreme precipitation events in Harbin and formulating countermeasures before disaster. The results showed that: (1) based on the calibration data of Harbin sounding station, the correlation coefficient of IGRA2 PWV and ERA5 PWV was 0.99, the mean deviation of IGRA2 PWV and ERA5 PWV was −0.91mm, the standard deviation was 2.01mm, and the RMSE was 2.20mm. It showed that ERA5 reanalysis data set had higher accuracy in Harbin. (2) The difference between GNSS PWV and ERA5 PWV was generally between ±4.00mm, the maximum mean deviation was −0.19mm, the maximum standard deviation was 1.51mm, and the maximum root mean square error was 1.52mm, indicating that GNSS had high accuracy in PWV inversion. (3) Based on the PWV value of GNSS inversion as the training data source, the RMSE of the training set of the constructed LSTM model was 0.73mm, indicating that GNSS PWV could train the LSTM model effectively. (4) The difference between LSTM PWV and GNSS PWV was generally maintained at ±5.00mm 12h before the precipitation event, and increased from 12h to 24h with the forecast step, and the difference between the two gradually increased to ±20mm. The variation trend of PWV was predicted by LSTM model and conducting shortterm predictions of precipitation events within 12 hours was feasible.

Key words: GNSS, Precipitable water vapor (PWV), ERA5, Long short?term memory (LSTM) model