中国农业气象 ›› 2017, Vol. 38 ›› Issue (06): 378-387.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2017.06.006

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

黄河三角洲湿地土壤毛管水运动特性研究

李鹏,潘英华,何福红,谭丽丽,季树新   

  1. 鲁东大学资源与环境工程学院,烟台 264025
  • 收稿日期:2016-10-26 出版日期:2017-06-20 发布日期:2017-06-17
  • 作者简介:李鹏(1991-),硕士生,主要从事区域水土资源利用与调控研究。E-mail: 694354652@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家水体污染控制与治理科技重大专项(2015ZX07203-007);山东省高等学校优势学科人才团队培育计划“蓝黄两区滨海资源与环境团队”项目;山东省自然科学基金项目(ZR2013DM010)

Research on Capillary Water Absorption Characteristics of Yellow River Delta Wetland Soil

LI Peng, PAN Ying-hua, HE Fu-hong, TAN Li-li, JI Shu-xin   

  1. School of Resource and Environment Engineering, Ludong University, Yantai 264025, China
  • Received:2016-10-26 Online:2017-06-20 Published:2017-06-17

摘要: 以黄河三角洲湿地土壤为研究对象,采用土柱实验方法,设置1.3、1.4、1.5g?cm-3共3个容重处理,实验时长120min,定时测定湿地盐碱土毛管水运动过程及积水入渗过程各指标,并通过Philip模型和Kostiakov模型拟合其动态规律性,以此了解黄河三角洲湿地土壤毛管水过程与运动特性。结果表明,不同容重条件下,湿地盐碱土毛管吸水过程各指标动态变化规律与非盐碱土一致;同等条件下,积水入渗过程各指标值均大于毛管吸水过程,各容重土壤积水入渗的初始入渗率和稳定入渗率分别在0.87~1.93cm?min-1和0.028~0.051cm?min-1,毛管吸水过程的相应指标值分别在0.32~0.43cm?min-1和0.025~0.034cm?min-1,入渗60min时,各容重积水入渗湿润锋距离和累积入渗量分别达到13.58~17.62cm和4.95~6.99cm,是同时刻毛管吸水的1.19~1.22倍和1.13~1.29倍。在实验观测的120min内,3种容重土壤毛管水上升高度与入渗湿润锋、累积毛管吸水量与累积入渗量间均存在显著的正相关关系(P<0.05)。利用Philip模型、Kostiakov模型对土壤毛管吸水过程和积水入渗过程进行模拟,两种模型对3种容重土壤均具有良好的适应性,但Philip模型对毛管吸水过程的模拟效果最佳,其R2值均大于0.9639,Kostiakov模型则更适于积水入渗过程的模拟,其R2值大于0.8819。

关键词: 湿地土壤, 入渗, 毛管吸水, 黄河三角洲, 不同容重, 模型拟合

Abstract: The Yellow River Delta wetland soil was taken as the research object, and indoor soil column experiment method was used to set 1.3, 1.4, 1.5g?cm-3 for 3 different bulk densities, and the experimental duration was 120min. The capillary water absorption and infiltration processes of wetland saline alkali soil were measured, and the dynamic regularity was also fitted by Philip model and Kostiakov model to understand the characteristics of soil capillary water process and movement in the wetland saline alkali soil of the Yellow River Delta. The results showed that under different bulk density conditions, the dynamic changes of capillary absorbed water for wetland saline alkali soil were the same as those of non-saline-alkali soils. Under the same conditions, the index values of infiltration process were greater than the capillary absorbed water process. The initial infiltration rate and steady infiltration rate of infiltration for different bulk density soils were 0.87-1.93cm?min-1 and 0.028-0.051cm?min-1, respectively. And the corresponding indices of capillary water absorption were 0.32-0.43cm?min-1 and 0.025-0.034cm?min-1, respectively. At 60min, wetting front depth and cumulatively infiltration of infiltration reached 13.58-17.62cm and 4.95-6.99cm for different bulk density soils, which is 1.19-1.22 times and 1.13-1.29 times of capillary absorbed water at the same time. In the 120min experiment, there was a significant positive correlation between capillary water rising height and wetting front depth of infiltration, cumulative absorbed water amount and infiltration amount(P<0.05). Using the Philip model and the Kostiakov model simulated the capillary water absorption and infiltration process. And the two models have good adaptability for three kinds of bulk density soils, but the Philip model was the best to simulate the capillary absorbed water process, the R2 values were greater than 0.9639. And the Kostiakov model was more suitable for the simulation of infiltration process, the R2 values were greater than 0.8819.

Key words: Wetland soil, Infiltration, Capillary absorbed water, The Yellow River Delta, Different bulk density, Model simulation