中国农业气象 ›› 2021, Vol. 42 ›› Issue (05): 412-425.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2021.05.006

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

核桃果实表面微气候环境与果实外观品质的关系

赵芳兄,刘立强,任佳星,刘国庆,郭金宝   

  1. 1新疆农业大学林学与园艺学院,乌鲁木齐 830052;2新疆木本粮油核桃林场,温宿 843100
  • 收稿日期:2020-10-27 出版日期:2021-05-20 发布日期:2021-05-16
  • 通讯作者: 刘立强,副教授,研究方向为果树栽培与生理,E-mail:llq9989@126.com E-mail:llq9989@126.com
  • 作者简介:赵芳兄,E-mail:2578799191@qq.com

Relationship between Walnut Fruit External Quality and Canopy Micro-climate

ZHAO Fang-xiong, LIU Li-qiang, REN Jia-xing, LIU Guo-qing, GUO Jin-bao   

  1. 1.College of Forestry and Horticulture, Xinjiang Agricultural University, Urumqi 830052, China; 2. Woody Grain and Oil and Walnut Forest Farm, Wensu, Xinjiang 843100
  • Received:2020-10-27 Online:2021-05-20 Published:2021-05-16
  • Supported by:

    新疆维吾尔自治区自然科学基金项目(2018D01A09

摘要:

以核桃品种185为试验材料,观测树冠不同方位和冠层果实表面微气候的变化规律与果实外观品质,分析微气候与果实外观品质的相关性,以探讨核桃树冠内不同位置的果实表面微气候对果实外观品质的影响,为核桃叶幕结构优化和树体微环境调控管理提供理论依据。结果表明:(1)在冠层内不同高度,随着冠层区域由下层到上层,全发育期果实表面平均光照强度和温度均增加,平均湿度表现为下降,果实的青皮果鲜重、青皮厚度、坚果鲜重、坚果干重、坚果纵径、坚果横径、果壳厚度、仁干重均有不同程度增加,而果壳露仁率减少;(2)同一高度冠层内,果实表面微气候环境和果实品质的差异明显小于树冠下层与上层的差异,优质的核桃果实主要集中在冠层外围和上层区域;在树冠不同方位,东侧和南侧的果实表面光照强度和温度均高于北侧和西侧,但东侧果实表面湿度却大于西侧,光照强度在同一高度冠层内不同方位差异显著,温度和湿度均无显著差异;(3)树冠不同方位和不同冠层的果实外观品质差异显著,与果实表面微气候有很强的相关性,其中,果实青皮果鲜重、青皮厚度、坚果鲜重、坚果干重、坚果纵径、坚果横径、果壳厚度、仁干重与光照强度、温度均呈显著正相关,与湿度呈显著负相关;果壳露仁率与果实表面光照强度和温度呈极显著负相关,与果实表面湿度呈显著正相关,东侧和南侧树冠果实的果壳露仁率与光照强度(−0.965、−0.838)和温度的负相关性最强(−0.895、−0.878),北侧和西侧树冠与湿度正相关性最强,相关系数分别为0.929和0.945;果实表面光照强度在不同方位和冠层高度对果实品质的影响最大,果实表面温度对果实品质的影响仅次于光照强度,而果实表面湿度对果实品质的影响相对较小。树冠内相应区域果实表面微气候显著影响核桃果实结构的建成,其协同效应对核桃果实品质的影响更大;树冠东侧和南侧、上层和外围接受的光照强度和温度较好,有利于果实的生长发育;树冠中、下层和树冠中部、内部果实品质更强烈地受到微气候环境的影响,基于叶幕结构和果实品质特性的园艺措施可改善果实表面微气候环境,有利于核桃果实品质的整体提高。

关键词: font-size:10.5pt, ">核桃font-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">微域环境因子font-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">方位font-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">冠层font-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">发育期font-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">外观品质

Abstract:

Using walnut variety 'Wen 185' as the test material, the changes in the surface microclimate and the external quality of the fruit in different crown positions and canopies were observed, and the correlation between the microclimate and the external quality of the fruit was analyzed. At different heights in the canopy, as the canopy area went from the lower layer to the upper layer, the average light intensity and temperature of the fruit surface during the whole development period increased, and the average humidity decreased. Nut dry weight, nut longitudinal diameter, nut transverse diameter, nut shell thickness, and kernel dry weight all increased to varying degrees, while the shell dew kernel rate decreased; within the same height canopy, the difference in the microclimate environment and fruit quality on the surface of the fruit was significantly smaller than the difference between the bottom layer and the upper layer of the canopy. The high-quality walnut fruits were mainly concentrated in the outer and upper layers of the canopy; in different positions of the canopy, the surface light intensity and temperature of the fruits on the east and south sides were higher than those on the north and west sides, but the humidity on the east side was higher than that on the west side. The light intensity was significantly different in different directions, and there was no significant difference in temperature and humidity; The external quality of fruits in different orientations and different canopies were significantly different, and had a strong correlation with the surface microclimate of the fruit. Among them, the fruit fresh weight, the thickness of the green peel, the fresh weight of the nut, the dry weight of the nut, the longitudinal diameter of the nut, the nut Horizontal diameter, shell thickness, kernel dry weight were significantly positively correlated with light intensity and temperature, and were significantly negatively correlated with humidity; the husk kernel rate was extremely significantly negatively correlated with fruit surface light intensity and temperature, and was significantly negatively correlated with fruit surface humidity, and there was a significant negative correlation. The fruit husks on the east and south canopies had the strongest negative correlation with light intensity (−0.965, −0.838) and temperature (−0.895, −0.878). The north and west canopies The strongest positive correlation was between the weight and the humidity, the correlation coefficients were 0.929 and 0.945, respectively; The fruit surface light intensity had the greatest impact on fruit quality in different orientations and canopy heights. The effect of fruit surface temperature on fruit quality was second only to light intensity, while fruit surface humidity had relatively little effect on fruit quality. The microclimate of the fruit surface in the corresponding area in the canopy significantly affects the establishment of walnut fruit structure, and its synergistic effect had a greater impact on walnut fruit quality. The east and south sides of the canopy, the upper layer and the periphery received better light intensity and temperature, which was conducive to the growth and development of the fruit. The quality of fruits in the middle and lower layers of the canopy and the middle and inside of the canopy was more strongly affected by the microclimate environment. Horticultural measures based on the leaf structure and fruit quality characteristics could improve the microclimate environment on the surface of the fruit, which was conducive to the overall improvement of walnut fruit quality.

Key words: font-size:10.5pt, ">Walnutfont-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">Micro-environmental factorsfont-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">Positionsfont-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">Canopyfont-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">Development periodfont-size:10.5pt, ">, font-size:10.5pt, ">Efont-size:10.5pt, ">xternalfont-size:10.5pt, "> , quality