中国农业气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (10): 1449-1459.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2025.10.007

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于气象因子的不同筋型小麦主要品质形成响应模型构建

商东耀,薛昌颖,郭燕玲,成林,余卫东   

  1. 中国气象局/河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点开放实验室/河南省气象科学研究所,郑州 450003
  • 收稿日期:2024-11-20 出版日期:2025-10-20 发布日期:2025-10-16
  • 作者简介:商东耀,E-mail:1978769569@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    河南省省级科技研发计划联合基金(232103810094);中国气象局·河南省农业气象保障与应用技术重点实验室开放基金(AMF202402);安阳国家气候观象台开放研究基金(AYNCOF202507)

Construction of Response Models for Major Quality Formation of Different Gluten-type Wheat Based on Meteorological Factors

SHANG Dong-yao, XUE Chang-ying, GUO Yan-ling, CHENG Lin, YU Wei-dong   

  1. China Meteorological Administration·Henan Agrometeorological Support and Applied Technique Key Laboratory/Henan Institute of Meteorological Science, Zhengzhou 450003, China
  • Received:2024-11-20 Online:2025-10-20 Published:2025-10-16

摘要:

基于河南省6个农业气象观测站2021−2023年‘新麦26’(强筋型)和‘扬麦15’(弱筋型)小麦品质数据及同期气象数据,利用相关分析法确定不同筋型小麦主要品质与气象因子的关系,并通过逐步回归构建主要品质指标对气象因子响应的定量方程。结果表明:站点间同种筋型小麦同一品质指标差异显著(P<0.05)。强筋型小麦品质总体优于弱筋型小麦,其中强筋型小麦籽粒蛋白质含量较弱筋型小麦高1.97g·100g1,湿面筋含量比弱筋型小麦高0.56个百分点,沉淀指数则比弱筋型小麦高24.25mL。拔节孕穗期温湿因素对两种筋型小麦蛋白质含量和沉淀指数均有显著影响(r>0.28,P<0.05),而抽穗开花期光照因素对两种筋型小麦湿面筋含量有显著负影响(r<−0.45,P<0.05)。此外,强筋型小麦的蛋白质含量主要受拔节−孕穗期温热因素、水湿因素及抽穗−开花期光照因素的影响,而弱筋型小麦的蛋白质含量还与乳熟−成熟期温热因素密切相关。两种筋型小麦的湿面筋含量均对抽穗−开花期的光照因素和乳熟−成熟期温热因素有显著响应。强筋型小麦的沉淀指数在抽穗−开花期易受光照因素影响,而弱筋型小麦的沉淀指数则在乳熟−成熟期更易受光照和温热因素的双重影响。逐步回归模型分析表明,不同筋型小麦的品质指标受不同气象因子的调控,且这些气象因子的影响在小麦不同发育时期存在显著差异。研究揭示了气象因子对小麦品质形成的调控机制,为优质专用小麦的区域化种植和精准农业管理提供了科学依据,对优化田间管理措施、应对气候变化及提高小麦生产质量具有重要意义。

关键词: 小麦品质, 气象因子, 强筋型小麦, 弱筋型小麦, 回归模型

Abstract:

Based on the quality data of ‘Xinmai 26’ (strong−gluten) and ‘Yangmai 15’ (weak−gluten) wheat varieties from six agro−meteorological stations in Henan province during 2021−2023, combined with concurrent meteorological data, correlation analysis was used to determine the relationships between key quality traits of different gluten−type wheat and meteorological factors. Stepwise regression was further employed to construct quantitative equations for the responses of main quality indices to meteorological variables. The results showed significant differences (P<0.05) in identical quality indices among stations for the same gluten−type wheat. Strong−gluten wheat generally exhibited superior quality compared to weak−gluten wheat, with grain protein content being 1.97 g·100g1 higher, wet gluten content 0.56pp higher, and sedimentation index 24.25 mL higher. Temperature and humidity factors during the jointing−booting stage exerted significant positive effects (r>0.28, P<0.05) on protein content and sedimentation index for both gluten types. Conversely, light intensity during the heading−flowering stage showed significant negative correlations (r<−0.45, P<0.05) with wet gluten content in both types. Specifically, protein content in strong−gluten wheat was primarily influenced by thermal and moisture factors during jointing−booting stage, along with light intensity during heading−flowering stage. For weak−gluten wheat, protein content additionally correlated closely with thermal factors during milk−ripening stage. Wet gluten content in both types responded significantly to light intensity during heading−flowering stage and thermal factors during milk−ripening to mature stage. Sedimentation index in strong−gluten wheat was sensitive to light intensity during heading−flowering stage, whereas weak−gluten wheat sedimentation index was more influenced by combined light and thermal factors during milk−ripening stage. Stepwise regression models indicated that quality indices of different gluten−type wheat were regulated by distinct meteorological factors, with significant temporal variations in factor effects across growth stages. This study reveals the regulatory mechanisms of meteorological factors on wheat quality formation, providing a scientific basis for the regionalized cultivation of highquality specialpurpose wheat and precision agricultural management. The findings have important implications for optimizing field practices, adapting to climate change, and enhancing wheat production quality.

Key words: Wheat quality, Meteorological factors, Strong?gluten wheat, Weak?gluten wheat, Regression model