中国农业气象

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

祁连山海北地区两种高寒草甸植被类型的土壤热通量比较

王建雷;李英年;王勤学;杜明远;薛晓娟;张法伟;   

  1. 中国科学院西北高原生物研究所;中国科学院研究生院;日本农业环境技术研究所;日本国立环境研究所;
  • 出版日期:2010-02-10 发布日期:2010-02-10
  • 基金资助:
    中国科学院西部行动计划项目(KZCX2-XB2-06-01);; 中日合作项目“温暖化影响的早期监测网络系统建设”;; 中国科学院知识创新工程重要方向项目(KZCX2-YW-432-1);; 中科院西北高原生物研究所百人计划项目

Comparative Analysis of Soil Heat Flux between Two Alpine Meadow Vegetation Types at Haibei Station,Qilian Mountains

WANG Jian-lei1,2,LI Ying-nian1,WANG Qin-xue3,DU Ming-yuan4,XUE Xiao-juan1,2,ZHANG Fa-wei1(1.Northwest Plateau Institution of Biology,Chinese Academy of Sciences,Xining 810001,China;2.Graduate School of the Chinese Academy of Sciences,Beijing 100049,China;3.National Institute Environmental Studies,Tsukuba 3058604,Japan;4.National Institute of Agro-Environment Sciences of Japan,Tsukuba 3050053,Japan)   

  • Online:2010-02-10 Published:2010-02-10

摘要: 对祁连山海北地区矮嵩草(Kobresia humilis)草甸和金露梅(Potentilla fruticosa)灌丛草甸两种植被类型土壤热通量观测和比较分析发现:晴天两种植被类型区土壤热通量日变化均表现为单峰型,夜间低午后高;阴雨天土壤热通量变化复杂,随降水或云层厚薄波动剧烈。金露梅灌丛草甸土壤热通量的日变化较矮嵩草草甸更为平稳。两种草甸土壤热通量的月际变化同样表现为单峰型,12月最低(矮嵩草草甸和金露梅灌丛草甸分别为-40.27MJ/m2和-16.85MJ/m2)、6月最高(矮嵩草草甸和金露梅灌丛草甸分别为20.47MJ/m2和18.98MJ/m2)。矮嵩草草甸与金露梅灌丛草甸土壤热通量的年总量差异明显,分别为-24.72MJ/m2和48.10MJ/m2。表现出前者由土壤深层向地表散热,而后者由地表向土壤深层输送热量。两种植被类型区不同时间尺度上的土壤热通量与冠层净辐射均有显著的线性相关关系。由于冠层厚度的影响,金露梅灌丛草甸土壤热通量所占净辐射的比例较小,同步性较差,反馈延时约2.5h,而矮嵩草草甸的土壤热通量与净辐射的相关性更加密切。

关键词: 金露梅灌丛草甸, 矮嵩草草甸, 土壤热通量, 净辐射

Abstract: Based on the measurement of soil heat flux of Kobresia humilis and Potentilla fruticosa meadows at Haibei station,Qilian Mountains,the results indicated that the diurnal change of soil heat flux for both types of meadows in clear days was lower at night and higher in the afternoon,representing a single-peak distribution.And it was complex in rainy days,with drastic fluctuation caused by rain and cloud.Whether it was sunny or not,the diurnal change of soil heat flux for Potentilla fruticosa meadow was more stable and its extent was smaller for high canopy height and much soil water content in Potentilla fruticosa meadow,with respecting to Koresia humilis.The monthly change of soil heat flux which was lowest in December(Kobresia humilis and Potentilla fruticosa meadows were-40.27MJ/m2,-16.85MJ/m2 respectively)and highest in June(Kobresia humilis and Potentilla fruticosa meadows were 20.47MJ/m2,18.98MJ/m2 respectively),appearing a single-peak distribution.The annual total soil heat flux for Kobresia humilis and Potentilla fruticosa meadows was significantly different and was-24.72MJ/m2 and 48.10MJ/m2 respectively.Both of the annual change of soil heat flux was relevant to the variations of plant growth,soil water,seasonal frozen soil,especially net radiation.Due to the difference of vegetation types and environment factors,Potentilla fruticosa meadows' soil heat flux was a smaller consumer of net radiation than that of Kobresia humili.However,the synchronicity between soil heat flux and net radiation was worse for Potentilla fruticosa,whose delay feedback was 2.5 hours,longer than that of Kobresia humilis.

Key words: Potentilla fruticosa meadows, Potentilla fruticosa meadows, Kobresia humili meadows, Soil heat flux, Net radiation