中国农业气象 ›› 2013, Vol. 34 ›› Issue (01): 74-80.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2013.01.011

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

几种光合作用光响应模型对烟草的适用性分析

钟楚,朱勇   

  1. 云南省气候中心,昆明 650034
  • 收稿日期:2012-05-24 出版日期:2013-02-20 发布日期:2013-04-17
  • 作者简介:钟楚(1985-),湖南郴州人,硕士,助理工程师,主要从事作物生理生态研究。Email:zhongchu2011@126.com
  • 基金资助:

    国家科技部公益性行业科研专项(GYHY200906021);云南省烟草昭通市公司项目(2010YN24)

Applicability Analysis about Different Photosynthetic Light response Models for Tobacco

ZHONG Chu, ZHU Yong   

  1. Yunnan Climate Center, Kunming 650034, China
  • Received:2012-05-24 Online:2013-02-20 Published:2013-04-17

摘要: 为探讨不同光响应曲线模型对烟草的适用性,分别测定云南赵桅基地K326叶片在20、30和35℃下的净光合速率光响应曲线,昭通自然条件下红花大金元(红大)、KRK26和云烟99叶片净光合速率的光响应曲线。用直角双曲线模型、非直角双曲线模型、动力学模型、指数模型以及叶子飘等构建的新光响应模型(新模型)对各光响应曲线进行拟合。结果表明,新模型对光饱和、非光饱和及光抑制的光响应曲线拟合均较好,指数模型对光饱和的光响应曲线拟合较好,其它3个模型对任何一种光响应的拟合效果均较差。指数模型和新模型拟合的最大净光合速率(Pmax)与实测值最接近,其它3个模型拟合的Pmax值偏高,以非直角双曲线模型偏高最明显。直角双曲线模型和非直角双曲线模型拟合的表观量子效率(α)普遍接近或超过最大量子效率理论值范围,指数模型和新模型拟合的α值在正常范围内,动力学模型拟合的α值则偏低。非直角双曲线模型拟合的光补偿点(Ic)明显低于实测值,其它模型拟合的Ic与实测值均较接近。直角双曲线模型、非直角双曲线模型和动力学模型不能直接计算光饱和点(Is),新模型拟合的Is与实测值均接近,出现光饱和及光抑制时,指数模型拟合的Is也与实测值接近。研究结果表明,以新模型对烟草光响应曲线进行拟合较为合理。

关键词: 光合作用, 光响应模型, 烟草, 适用性

Abstract: In order to reveal applicability of different photosynthetic light response models for tobacco, the light response curves of net photosynthetic rates of K326, which treated with 20℃, 30℃ and 35℃ in Zhaowei base in Yuxi, and Honghuadajinyuan (Hongda), KRK26 and Yunyan99, which in natural conditions in Zhaotong, were determined respectively. The photosynthetic light-response curves were simulated by rectangular hyperbolae model, non rectangular hyperbolae model, exponential model, kinetics model and a new model. The results showed that the new model simulated well to light-response curves of light saturation, non light saturation and light inhibition, exponential model simulated well to light saturated response curve, and other three models could not simulated to any light-response curves. The maximum net photosynthetic rates (Pmax) of exponential model and new model were closed to measured values, Pmax of the other three models was higher than measured values, obviously in non rectangular hyperbolae model. Apparent quantum yield (α) of rectangular hyperbolae model and non rectangular hyperbolae model was closed to or exceed than the theoretical value range of maximum quantum yield. α value of exponential model and new model was in normal range, while that of kinetic model was lower. Light component point (Ic) of the models were close to measured values except non rectangular hyperbolae model, which was lower than measured values. Rectangular hyperbolae model, non rectangular hyperbolae model and kinetic model could not use for calculating light saturation point (Is) directly. All the Is of new model were close to measured values. When there were light saturation and light inhibition, Is of exponential model was close to measured value as well. The results indicated that the new model was reasonable for simulating tobacco light response curve.

Key words: Photosynthesis, Light response model, Tobacco, Applicability