中国农业气象 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (5): 781-796.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2026.05.012

• 农业气象保险栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

风险建模视角下天气指数保险控制基差险和系统性风险的研究进展

张译元,孟生旺   

  1. 1. 哈尔滨师范大学数学科学学院,哈尔滨 150025;2. 中国人民大学统计学院,北京 100872
  • 收稿日期:2025-10-20 出版日期:2026-05-20 发布日期:2026-05-18
  • 作者简介:张译元,E-mail:yiyuan-zhang@hrbnu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金青年项目(72301086)

Advances in Managing Basis and Systemic Risks in Weather Index Insurance: A Risk Modeling Perspective

ZHANG Yi-yuan, MENG Sheng-wang   

  1. 1. School of Mathematics, Harbin Normal University, Harbin 150025, China; 2. School of Statistics, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872
  • Received:2025-10-20 Online:2026-05-20 Published:2026-05-18

摘要:

天气指数保险作为创新型保险产品,是应对农业气象灾害的重要风险管理工具之一,具有运营成本低、不易出现道德风险和逆向选择等优点,但是却面临基差风险和系统性风险的双重挑战。本研究从风险建模角度出发,系统总结当前天气指数保险在基差风险和系统性风险控制方面的成果,从天气指数设计、天气指数-产量关系建模、农业气象系统性风险应对等方面,分析现有研究方法的优缺点以及发展趋势,并提出未来展望,以期为中国天气指数保险的优化设计、农业气象风险管理的推进以及粮食安全保障提供有益参考。结果表明:在天气指数设计层面,多源数据融合、多灾因、多指标和定制天气指数是控制基差风险的主要手段;在天气指数-产量关系建模层面,高维度、非对称、非线性与交互性是控制基差风险的关键;在系统性风险的研究层面,多变量时空相依建模是系统性风险度量的研究重点,再保险、购买金融衍生品和扩大风险池是分散系统性风险的主要策略。多灾因耦合机制不清、作物受灾机理不明,现有研究尚未能解决多灾种交互作用导致作物减产的量化问题,未来可基于数据与模型联合驱动挖掘多种气象风险之间复杂相依关系及其对作物减产的复合影响。产品设计方面,现有研究多采用分步研究方法,会导致误差累加,扩大产品设计与预期的差距,未来需进一步探索从产品设计整体考虑的最优天气指数保险的设计框架。天气指数保险的基差风险和系统性风险存在此消彼长、相互转化的关系,未来需从整体探究保险的责任边界。

关键词: 天气指数设计, 指数-产量关系, 多变量时空相依, 数据与模型

Abstract:

Weather index insurance, as an innovative insurance product, serves as a key risk management tool in mitigating agricultural meteorological disasters. It features low operating costs and reduced susceptibility to moral hazard and adverse selection. Nevertheless, it faces the dual challenges of base risk and systemic risk. This paper systematically provided a systematic review of current research on the control of base risk and systemic risk in weather index insurance, with a particular focus on the risk modeling perspective. It examined existing methodologies in key areas such as weather index design, modeling of the relationship between weather indices and crop yields, and the modeling of agricultural meteorological systemic risks. The strengths and limitations of these approaches were analyzed, along with emerging trends. Finally, the study identified areas for further research, aiming to provide valuable insights for the optimizing design of weather index insurance in China, advancing of agricultural meteorological risk management and the safeguarding of food security. The results indicated that multi-source data integration, multiple disaster causes, multiple indicators and customized weather indicators were the main approaches to control base risk at the level of weather index design. At the modeling level of the weather index-yield relationship, high dimensionality, asymmetry, nonlinearity and interactions were key to managing base risk. Spatiotemporal dependence modeling of multiple variables was the primary focus for measuring systemic risk, while reinsurance, purchasing financial derivatives and expanding risk pools were the primary strategies for mitigating systemic risk. The coupling mechanisms of multiple disaster factors remained unclear, and the impact mechanism of crop damage was not well understood. Existing research had not effectively addressed the quantitative assessment of crop yield loss due to the interaction of multiple disaster types. Future research might explore the complex dependencies among various meteorological risks and their compound effects on crop yield reduction through data and model-driven approaches. In terms of product design, most researches adopted a step-by-step approach, which could lead to cumulative errors and result in a mismatch between the final product and the intended objectives. Future research should further explore an integrated framework for the optimal design of weather index insurance. Moreover, base risk and systemic risk exhibit a trade-off and may transform into each other. Therefore, it is essential to examine the boundary of insurance liability from a holistic perspective that considers both types of risk.

Key words: Weather index design, Index-yield relationship, Multivariate spatio-temporal dependence, Data and model