中国农业气象 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (11): 902-911.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2022.11.004

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

生殖生长期弱光对番茄表型特征和果实品质的影响

谭蓉,贾桃,陈晓丽,郭文忠   

  1. 1.宁夏大学农学院,银川 750000;2.北京市农林科学院智能装备技术研究中心,北京 100097
  • 收稿日期:2021-12-27 出版日期:2022-11-20 发布日期:2022-11-18
  • 通讯作者: 郭文忠,研究员,主要从事蔬菜栽培管理与设施园艺工程研究。 E-mail:guowz@ nercita.org.cn
  • 作者简介:谭蓉,E-mail:1198717582@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    北京市农林科学院青年科研基金项目(QNJJ202119);宁夏回族自治区重点研发计划项目(2018BBF02024)

Low Light during Reproductive Period of Tomato affects the Phenotypic Characteristics and Quality of Fruit

TAN Rong ,JIA Tao,CHEN Xiao-li,GUO Wen-zhong   

  1. 1.College of Agronomy, Ningxia University, Yinchuan 750000, China;2.Intelligent Equipment Technology Research Center of Beijing Academy of Agricultural and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097
  • Received:2021-12-27 Online:2022-11-20 Published:2022-11-18

摘要: 在人工光型植物工厂中以番茄品种“丰收74-560 RZ F1”为试材,分别在花期、果实膨大期、转色期、采收期进行160μmol·m−2·s−1的弱光处理,非处理的生殖生长期光强度均保持在1000μmol·m−2·s−1,通过番茄生长和果实品质指标评估不同生殖生长期弱光对番茄的影响。结果表明:(1)花期或膨大期弱光处理对番茄植株形态结构影响较大,其中花期弱光处理下的番茄植株徒长趋势最突出,且平均单株叶片数和节数最少,较对照分别减少了3.5个和1.6个;膨大期弱光处理后番茄叶片叶绿素a/b值及类胡萝卜素含量较其他处理显著降低;花期弱光处理后单株第一果穗坐果数较对照降低了53%,其他发育期弱光处理后坐果数均未受到显著影响;花期或膨大期弱光处理后平均单株第一、二、三果穗产量均显著低于其他发育期弱光处理;(2)与对照相比,各发育期弱光处理导致番茄第一穗果实可溶性固形物含量均出现不同程度的降低,其中花期降低25%,转色期弱光处理后番茄果实可溶性糖含量较对照降低15%,但总酸含量提高了26%,导致该处理下番茄果实糖酸比最低;与对照相比,所有发育期弱光处理后果实维生素C含量均有所降低,以采收期弱光处理后番茄果实维生素C含量最低。研究表明弱光导致番茄产量和品质降低,且不同生殖阶段番茄对弱光的敏感性有所差异。根据不同时期番茄生长特性及其对弱光的响应特点进行针对性补光对设施番茄稳质稳产具有一定的意义。

关键词: 番茄, 弱光, 植物工厂, 生殖生长期, 果实品质

Abstract: "Harvest 74-560 RZ F1" tomato was cultivated in a plant factory with LEDs. One of the four reproductive stages (flowering stage, expanding stage, color turning stage and harvesting stage) was subjected to low light intensity of 160μmol·m−2·s−1, while the other three stages maintained 1000 μmol·m−2·s−1. The light intensity kept 1000μmol·m−2·s−1 at all the reproductive stages in the control. The growth and fruit quality indices were measured to evaluate the effects of low light on tomato. The results showed that: (1) low light significantly affected the morphology of tomato plants at the flowering stage and expanding stage. Low light at flowering stage resulted in the most prominent overgrowth trend of tomato plants, as well as the least average number of leaves and nodes per plant which respectively decreased by 3.5 and 1.6 compared with the control. Low light at the expansion stage significantly reduced the content of carotenoid and the value of Chla/b compared with the control. The number of fruit set per plant after low light treatment at flowering stage was 53% lower than that of the control, while the number of fruit set per plant was not significantly affected by low light at other reproductive stages. The average yield of the first, second and third ear per plant after low light treatment at flowering or expansion stage was significantly lower than the other treatments. (2) Compared with the control, low light treatments decreased the soluble solid content of tomato fruit (first ear) in varying degrees, among which, the soluble solid content decreased by 25% after low light treatment at flowering stage. The soluble sugar content of tomato fruit decreased by 15% compared with the control, on the contrary, the total acid content increased by 26%, resulting in the lowest sugar/acid ratio of tomato fruit under this treatment. Compared with the control, low light treatments decreased the vitamin C content of tomato fruit in varying degrees, among which, the lowest vitamin C content was detected in tomato fruit subjected to low light treatment at the harvesting stage. This study showed that low light reduced the yield and quality of tomato, and the sensitivity of tomato to low light was different at varied reproductive stages. According to the growth characteristics and responses of tomato subjected to low light at different periods, it is of certain significance to supplement artificial light in order to stabilize the quality and yield of protected tomato.

Key words: Tomato, Low light, Plant factory, Reproductive period, Fruit quality