中国农业气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (11): 1604-1613.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2025.11.007

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

东北地区日光温室冬季番茄蒸散量估算模型筛选

胡蕴鹏,罗新兰,王晓桐,石俊磊,倪妍   

  1. 1. 沈阳农业大学农学院,沈阳 110866;2. 天津国能津能滨海热电有限公司,天津 300459;3. 沈阳农业大学园艺学院,沈阳 110866
  • 收稿日期:2024-12-18 出版日期:2025-11-20 发布日期:2025-11-18
  • 作者简介:胡蕴鹏,E-mail:3063424056@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(32272005)

Selection of an Evapotranspiration Estimation Model for Winter Tomato Cultivation in Solar Greenhouses in Northeast China

HU Yun-peng, LUO Xin-lan, WANG Xiao-tong, SHI Jun-lei, NI Yan   

  1. 1. College of Agronomy, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866, China; 2. Tianjin Guoneng Jinneng Binhai Thermal Power Co., Ltd, Tianjin 300459; 3. College of Horticulture, Shenyang Agricultural University, Shenyang 110866
  • Received:2024-12-18 Online:2025-11-20 Published:2025-11-18

摘要:

于2024年1月6日−2月2日在沈阳农业大学教学科研基地辽沈型节能日光温室进行试验温室内种植基质袋培番茄,用黑色塑料薄膜覆盖全部地面最大程度减少土壤蒸发。使用热扩散式茎流计测量番茄茎流速率计算蒸腾量作为蒸散实测值,对4个蒸散模型(FAO56 PMFAO24 PenPTMak)进行适用性评价,并对Mak模型进行修正,以期为东北日光温室选取适用的蒸散模型。结果表明:(1)根据平均绝对百分比误差(MAPE、平均预测误差(MPE)和均方根误差(RMSE)指标4个模型模拟效果表现FAO24 Pen > PT > FAO56 PM > Mak,虽然FAO24 Pen模拟效果最好,但仍不足以在实际生产中使用。(2)主成分分析结果表明,温度、相对湿度和太阳辐射是影响温室内蒸散的主要因子,因此Mak模型中引入相对湿度因子进行修正,其模拟结果与实测值相比,MAPEMPERMSE分别为9.391%0.051mm·d10.068mm·d1RMSE修正前降低80%,比FAO24 Pen54%,可较好模拟温室内蒸散量,说明修正后的Mak模型比较适合东北日光温室冬季番茄作物的蒸散计算,研究可为严冬季节东北日光温室作物智能灌溉系统提供参考。

关键词: 日光温室, 基质袋培番茄, 蒸散模型, 热扩散式茎流仪, 适用性

Abstract:

The experiment was conducted from January 6 to February 2, 2024 in a Liaoshen type II energy-efficient solar greenhouse at the Shenyang Agricultural University research base. Tomato plants were grown in substrate bags. The ground was covered with black plastic film to minimize soil evaporation. The stem sap flow rates of tomato plants were measured via thermal dissipation probes (TDPs) to calculate transpiration as the measured evapotranspiration (ET) value. Four evapotranspiration models (FAO56 PM, FAO24 Pen, PT and Mak) were evaluated, and the Mak model subsequently was modified with the aim of identifying a suitable ET estimation model for solar greenhouses in northeast China. The results revealed that: (1) the model overall performance, ranked by the mean absolute percentage error (MAPE), mean prediction error (MPE) and root mean square error (RMSE), was FAO24 Pen>PT>FAO56 PM>Mak. Although the FAO24 Pen model achieved the highest performance indices (MAPE=20.263%, MPE=0.122mm·d1 and RMSE=0.149mm·d1), its predictive accuracy remained insufficient for the estimation of actual evapotranspiration (ET). (2) Principal component analysis (PCA) revealed that temperature, relative humidity and solar radiation were the dominant factors influencing evapotranspiration within the greenhouse. In order to enhance the model performance compared to the measured values, the Mak model was modified by incorporating a relative humidity parameter. Compared to the measured values, the modified Mak model demonstrated a significant improvement in accuracy, with evaluation metrics of MAPE=9.391%, MPE=0.051mm·d1 and RMSE=0.068mm·d1. Significantly, the RMSE was reduced by approximately 80% compared to the original Mak model and by 54% lower than that of the FAO24 Pen model. These findings suggest that the modified Mak model achieves validated accuracy in estimating the evapotranspiration of tomato in solar greenhouses in northeast China during winter. The results of this study provide valuable references for intelligent irrigation systems for crops in solar greenhouses in northeast China during the cold winter seasons.

Key words: Solar greenhouse, Substrate bag cultivation of tomato, Evapotranspiration model, Thermal dissipation probes, Applicability