中国农业气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (12): 1708-1721.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2025.12.003

• 农业生态环境栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用Meta分析不同生产环境下玉米草谷比的差异

曾新丽,张琪,刘忠贤,戴思垣   

  1. 南京信息工程大学生态与应用气象学院/农业与生态气象江苏省高校重点实验室,南京 210044
  • 收稿日期:2025-01-07 出版日期:2025-12-20 发布日期:2025-12-16
  • 作者简介:曾新丽,E-mail:zxl13960571898@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    江苏省科技厅碳达峰碳中和科技创新专项项目(BE2023400)

Difference of Maize Straw-to-grain Ratio under Different Production Environments Based on Meta-analysis

ZENG Xin-li, ZHANG Qi, LIU Zhong-xian, DAI Si-yuan   

  1. School of Ecology and Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology/Jiangsu Provincial University Key Laboratory of Agricultural and Ecological Meteorology, Nanjing 210044, China
  • Received:2025-01-07 Online:2025-12-20 Published:2025-12-16

摘要:

草谷比可为估算秸秆资源量、农田作物固碳潜力评估等提供科学依据。本研究通过检索117篇玉米草谷比相关的试验性文献,采用Meta分析方法,整合定量分析不同地区、年份、田间管理方式及环境胁迫玉米草谷比。结果表明:1中国区域玉米生产草谷比差异显著,整体呈北高南低的特征,均值为1.17220012022年玉米草谷比整体降低11.81%,且年际差异显著;3随着种植密度和施氮量的增加,玉米草谷比先减后增的趋势,种植密度在6×104104·hm−2氮肥量100200kg·hm−2区间效果最佳,玉米草谷比最低可降解地膜覆盖与翻耕还田均可显著降低玉米草谷比,分别降低11.29%10.48%4玉米开花期遭遇环境胁迫对玉米草谷比的影响最大;高温干旱复合胁迫对玉米草谷比的影响较单一胁迫更显著,玉米草谷比增大75.00%综上可知,不同生产环境下玉米草谷比差异明显。本研究明确了不同地区、年份、田间管理方式及环境胁迫下较为合理的玉米草谷比,为玉米秸秆资源量及固碳潜力的估算提供数据支持,对提高秸秆资源的利用效率和评估农田作物的碳汇潜力具有重要意义。

关键词: 玉米, 草谷比, Meta分析, 差异性, 影响因素

Abstract:

Determining the strawtograin ratio provides a scientific basis for improving the accuracy of straw resource estimation and assessing the carbon sequestration potential of crops. This study reviewed 117 experimental articles related to the maize strawtograin ratio and applied Metaanalysis to integrate and quantitatively analyze the strawtograin ratio of maize under different regions, years, field management practices and environmental stresses. The results showed that: (1) there was a significant difference in the maize strawtograin ratio across China, with the overall trend being higher in the north and lower in the south, with an average value of 1.17. (2) From 2001 to 2022, the maize strawtograin ratio decreased by 11.81%, with significant interannual variation. (3) The effect of planting density and nitrogen application rate on the strawtograin ratio of maize followed a trend of first decreasing and then increasing. The optimal effect, with the lowest strawtograin ratio, was observed at a planting density of 6×104–7×104 plants·ha1 and nitrogen fertilizer application of 100200kg·ha1. Biodegradable plastic film coverage and ploughing with straw return both significantly reduced the maize strawtograin ratio, with reductions of 11.29% and 10.48%, respectively. (4) Environmental stress during the flowering period had the greatest impact on the maize strawtograin ratio. Combined heat and drought stress had a more significant effect than individual stresses, increasing the strawtograin ratio by 75.00%. In conclusion, significant differences in the maize strawtograin ratio exist under different production environments. This study identifies a more reasonable maize strawtograin ratio under different regions, years, field management practices, and environmental stresses, providing data support for the estimation of maize straw resources and carbon sequestration potential. This is of great significance for improving the utilization efficiency of straw resources and assessing the carbon sink potential of agricultural crops.

Key words: Maize, Straw?to?grain ratio, Meta analysis, Differences, Influencing factors