Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology ›› 2024, Vol. 45 ›› Issue (10): 1123-1130.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2024.10.003

Previous Articles     Next Articles

Effect of Shelterbelt Structure on Particulate Matter Concentration in Bashang Area

YAN Bing, CUI Yue, FAN Ming-yuan, LI Zhi-xue, SUN Li-bo, CHANG Xiao-min   

  1. 1.Academy of Forestry, Shanxi Agricultural University, Jinzhong 030801, China;2.Institute of Loess Plateau, Shanxi University, Taiyuan 030000
  • Received:2023-11-12 Online:2024-10-20 Published:2024-10-17

Abstract:

 Wind erosion and dust in farmland soil release a large amount of PM1, PM2.5 and PM10 into the air, leading to serious air pollution. In this study, a combination of field investigation and semi-fixed monitoring methods were used to measure wind speed and particulate matter concentration at different locations before and after three kinds of shelterbelts, namely tight structure (5667plant·ha1), transparent structure (3000plant·ha1) and ventilation structure (950plant·ha1). The wind-proof effect and particle reduction rate were calculated, the wind-proof effect of different structure shelterbelts was analyzed, and the particle reduction rate of shelterbelts and its influencing factors were explored. In order to optimize the structural parameters of the shelterbelt and strengthen the retarding function of the shelterbelt to PM1, PM2.5, PM10 and other particles. The results showed that: (1) the wind protection effect at 1m height of the shelterbelt was: transparent structure shelterbelt (37.95%) > tight structure shelterbelt (32.61%) > ventilation structure shelterbelt (25.67%). The wind protection effect at 2m height of the shelterbelt was: transparent structure shelterbelt (49.66%) > ventilation structure shelterbelt (19.64%) > tight structure shelterbelt (19.38%). (2) The reduction rate of PM2.5 in tight structure shelterbelt was 22.5%, and the reduction rate of PM1 in transparent structure shelterbelt and ventilation structure shelterbelt was 41.36% and 18.06%, respectively. (3) Meteorological factors had the greatest influence on PM10 concentration, and there was a significant positive correlation between PM2.5 concentration and wind speed behind the forest belt (P<0.01).

Key words: Shelterbelt, Structure, Windproof efficiency, Particulate concentration