中国农业气象 ›› 2020, Vol. 41 ›› Issue (05): 288-298.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2020.05.003

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

 三江源地区冻土/非冻土期近地层能量平衡特征及其影响因子分析

 张功,韩辉邦,孙守家,张劲松,郑宁   

  1.  1.安徽省林业科学研究院/安徽黄山森林生态系统国家定位观测研究站,合肥 239500;2.青海省人工影响天气办公室,西宁 810001;3.中国林业科学研究院林业研究所/国家林业局林木培育重点实验室,北京 100091
  • 出版日期:2020-05-20 发布日期:2020-05-14
  • 通讯作者: 韩辉邦,E-mail:hmjerry@163.com;孙守家,E-mail:ssj1011@163.com
  • 作者简介:张功,E-mail:12720484zg@sina.cn
  • 基金资助:
     中央级公益性科研院所基本科研业务费“三江源湿地温室气体通量变化及增温潜势研究”(CAFYBB2016SY003);国家自然科学基金“基于双波段闪烁仪法获取大尺度地表水热通量的研究” (41771364)

 Mechanistic and Characteristics of Near-surface Energy Balance in Frozen/Non- frozen Soil Period of the Three-River Headwater Region

 ZHANG Gong, HAN Hui-bang, SUN Shou-jia, ZHANG Jin-song, ZHENG Ning   

  1.  1. Anhui Academy of Forestry/Anhui Huangshan Forest Ecosystem National Positioning Observation Station, Hefei 239500, China; 2. Qinghai Province Weather Modification Office, Xining 810001; 3. Research Institute of Forestry, Chinese Academy of Forestry/Key Laboratory of Tree Breeding and Cultivation of State Forestry Administration, Beijing 100091
  • Online:2020-05-20 Published:2020-05-14
  • Supported by:
     

摘要:  利用三江源地区2018年1-12月涡动相关系统的观测数据,分析该地区冻土/非冻土期内各能量分项支出分配特征和能量平衡闭合率及其影响因子,以揭示其能量平衡特征。结果表明:显热通量、潜热通量、土壤热通量变化趋势与净辐射相似,且在年尺度、日尺度上具有典型的单峰型变化,但潜热通量、土壤热通量的峰值出现时间具有滞后性。非冻土期内,显热、潜热支出以及土壤吸收的热量占总能量的比例分别为0.38、0.37、0.10;而在冻土期内,上述各能量的支出比分别为0.54、0.19、?0.01。全年能量平衡闭合率为0.69,能量平衡闭合率在冻土期和非冻土期内分别为0.63、0.74。三江源地区冻土期内显热支出为主要能量消耗方式,且在该时段内影响能量平衡闭合率的因素主要是湍流动力因子;非冻土期的能量消耗方式为潜热和显热,热力和动力因子均对能量平衡闭合率产生影响。

关键词:  , 涡动相关系统, 能量平衡, 大气稳定度, 摩擦速度, 热力湍流

Abstract:  The exchanging of Energy and water between land and atmosphere over Qinghai-Tibet Plateau play an important role in climate system in China and eastern Asia. As the core area of the Qinghai-Tibet Plateau, the Three-River headwater region is an important water conservation area in China, and the heating and energy exchange over there is significantly. However, there is not any observation about interaction between land and atmosphere in the Three-River headwater region due to the formidable natural conditions. To get more information about the heating effect and energy exchange in this region, measurement has been carried out at location of 33°12′N, 96°30′E, with an altitude of 4167m, based on eddy covariance system (CAST3 and Li-7500A) from January to December. The data observed from eddy covariance system in frozen soil period (from January to April and December) and non-frozen soil period (from May to November) were used to analyze the distribution of each energy component, energy balance closure rate and influence factors of the energy balance closure rate in this area, respectively. The results showed that trends of sensible heat, latent heat, and soil heat flux were consistent with net radiation. Each of them had typical unimodal changes on both annual and daily scales. However, there is time lagging between the maximum of latent and soil heat flux. Total daily net radiation and sensible heat flux increased from March and got the maximum at mid-June, with values of 15.03MJ·m-2·d-1 and 7.81MJ·m-2·d-1, respectively. The proportion of sensible heat during non-frozen soil period was 0.38, latent heat was 0.37, and the proportion of soil heat consumption was 0.10, while during the period of frozen soil, the proportion of the above item is 0.54 and 0.19, -0.01, respectively. The annual energy balance closure of the Three-River headwater region was 0.69, energy balance closure rate in frozen / non-frozen soil period was 0.63 and 0.74, respectively. It can be concluded that sensible heat was the main energy budget item during the frozen soil period, and turbulent forcing is the key factor that affects the energy balance closure rate in the Three-Rivers headwater region, while both latent and sensible heat were the ways of energy consumption, and the dominated factors affected energy balance closure rate were thermal and kinetic factors during the non-frozen soil period.

Key words:  Eddy covariance system, Energy balance, Atmospheric stability, Friction velocity, Thermal turbulence

中图分类号: