中国农业气象 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (10): 1693-1703.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2026.10.013

• 农业气象灾害栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

中国苹果花期霜冻损失与风险评估研究进展

杨晓娟,刘恩科,陈迪,刘璐,韩锐,白慧卿,张艺佳,刘布春   

  1. 1. 中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所/作物高效用水与抗灾减损国家工程实验室/农业农村部农业环境重点实验室,北京 100081;2. 陕西省气象局,西安 710014
  • 收稿日期:2025-07-08 出版日期:2026-10-20 发布日期:2026-10-19
  • 作者简介:杨晓娟,E-mail:yangxiaojuan@caas.cn
  • 基金资助:
    国家重点研发计划项目(2023YFD2301000);中国农业科学院科技创新工程项目

Advances in Assessing Frost Loss and Risk during China's Apple Blossom Period

YANG Xiao-juan, LIU En-ke, CHEN Di, LIU Lu, HAN Rui, BAI Hui-qing, ZHANG Yi-jia, LIU Bu-chun   

  1. 1. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences/National Engineering Laboratory of Efficient Crop Water Use and Disaster Reduction/Key Laboratory of Agricultural Environment, Ministry of Agriculture and Rural Affairs, Beijing 100081, China; 2. Shaanxi Meteorological Bureau, Xi'an 710014
  • Received:2025-07-08 Online:2026-10-20 Published:2026-10-19

摘要:

苹果花期霜冻灾害频发重发,严重威胁产量和品质。本研究通过分类归纳与系统分析,阐述中国苹果花期霜冻定义和指标,综述苹果花期霜冻灾害损失与风险评估的研究进展,剖析现存问题并提出未来研究重点。结果表明:基于日最低温度的单一要素苹果花期霜冻指标研究和应用最为广泛。苹果花期霜冻灾害损失评估以统计模型为主导,通过多种方法融合能精准识别关键致灾因子、构建相应的苹果损失模型;STICS模型能有效评估苹果花期霜冻对产量的影响。广义苹果花期霜冻风险评估涉及多因子且通常存在主观性和不确定性,研究和应用具有一定的局限性,狭义苹果花期霜冻风险评估和花期霜冻时间暴露性风险评估成果较为突出,未来气候情景下渤海湾和西南冷凉高地产区苹果花期霜冻风险可能降低,黄土高原产区的霜冻风险可能增加,新疆产区风险虽可能减少,但霜冻强度增加。苹果花期提前是温带种植区霜冻强度加重的核心原因。构建综合性、本地化苹果花期霜冻指标以及建立多模型耦合评估方法是未来中国苹果花期霜冻损失与风险评估的核心和关键途径。

关键词: 损失评估, 风险评估, 数理统计, 作物模型

Abstract:

Apples are of great importance in the global and Chinese fruit industries. Against the backdrop of climate change, frost disasters during the apple blossom period are occurring with increasing frequency and severity, posing a serious threat to yield and quality. Classification, summarization and systematic analysis were employed in this study. Based on the concepts and indicators that define apple blossom frost in China, it reviewed research progress on frost disaster loss and risk assessment during this critical period, analyzed existing issues and proposed future research priorities. The results show that the single factor about apple blossom frost indicator based on the daily minimum temperature was currently the most widely used. The assessment of frost damage during apple blossom was dominated by statistical models and the integration of various methods had been effective in identifying key disaster-causing factors and constructing loss models. Significant progress had also been made in assessing the impact of frost on yield during apple blossom using the STICS model. The risk assessment of apple blossom frost involved multiple factors and often suffered from subjectivity and uncertainty, with relatively limited research and applications. In contrast, notable achievements had been made in the narrow risk assessment of apple blossom frost and temporal exposure risk assessment. It was projected that frost risks would decrease in the Bohai bay and the southwestern high-altitude of cold regions, while it would increase in the Loess plateau region. While the risk might decrease in Xinjiang production area, the intensity of the frost was expected to intensify. The earlier flowering period of apple trees had been identified as a central cause of increased frost intensity in temperate growing regions. In the future, the construction of comprehensive and localized apple blossom frost indicators and the establishment of multi-model coupled assessment methods will be the core and key approaches for frost loss and risk assessment during apple blossom period in China. 

Key words: Loss assessment, Risk assessment, Mathematical statistics, Crop model