中国农业气象 ›› 2025, Vol. 46 ›› Issue (8): 1206-1220.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2025.08.012

• 农业气象保险栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

气候变化背景下农业保险对粮食安全影响机制及调节效应

安敏,马权,韦雅倩   

  1. 三峡大学经济与管理学院,宜昌 443002
  • 修回日期:2024-12-13 出版日期:2025-08-20 发布日期:2025-08-19
  • 作者简介:安敏,副教授,主要从事资源环境管理研究,E-mail:anmin@ctgu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    教育部人文社会科学研究青年基金项目(24YJC790002)

Impact Mechanism and Moderating Effects of Agricultural Insurance on Food Security Under Climate Change

AN Min, MA Quan, WEI Ya-qian   

  1. College of Economics and Management, China Three Gorges University, Yichang 443002, China
  • Revised:2024-12-13 Online:2025-08-20 Published:2025-08-19

摘要:

基于20012021年31个省份农业统计数据及气象数据,从粮食供给能力、可获得性、稳定性以及可持续性4个维度构建粮食安全指标体系,以气温和降水量月均值的波动性表征气候变化,通过固定效应双向模型、调节效应模型分析气候变化对粮食安全的影响机制以及农业保险的调节效应,以期为探究农业保险、气候变化与粮食安全的关系,优化气候适应性农业保险政策,制定区域差异化粮食安全战略提供参考。结果表明:(120012021年气温和降水波动性对中国粮食安全影响显著。其中,气温波动性对粮食安全呈负向影响,降水波动性对粮食安全呈极显著正向影响(P<0.01)。(2农业保险的调节效应体现在可极显著削弱气温波动性对粮食安全的负向影响(P<0.01),极显著增强降水波动性对粮食安全的正向影响(P<0.01)。3)气候变化对粮食安全的影响及农业保险的作用存在区域差异。气温波动性对南方粮食安全呈负向影响,降水波动性对北方粮食安全的促进作用显著(P<0.05);农业保险的调节作用可极显著削弱气温波动性对粮食安全的负向影响(P<0.01)。从粮食功能区来看,气温波动性对粮食主产区、主销区及产销平衡区的粮食安全影响回归系数分别为0.00850.00120.0421,对粮食产销平衡区的负向影响最大(P<0.05),农业保险在粮食主产区的调节作用最强,能同时削弱气温(P<0.01)及降水波动性(P<0.05)对粮食安全的不利影响。

关键词: 粮食安全, 气候变化, 农业保险, 异质性

Abstract:

Based on agricultural statistics data and meteorological data from 31 provinces in 20012021, a food security indicator system was constructed from four dimensions: food supply capacity, availability, stability and sustainability. Climate change was characterized by the fluctuation of monthly average temperature and precipitation. The impact mechanism of climate change on food security and the moderating effects of agricultural insurance were analyzed by using fixed−effects bidirectional model and moderation effect model, aiming to provide references for exploring the relationship of agricultural insurance, climate change and food security, optimizing climate-adaptive agricultural insurance policies, and formulating regionally differentiated food security strategies. The results indicated that: (1) the fluctuation of temperature and precipitation from 2001 to 2021 had a significant impact on China's food security. Specifically, temperature fluctuation had a negative effect on food security, while precipitation fluctuation had a highly significant positive impact on food security (P<0.01). (2) The moderating effect of agricultural insurance was reflected in significantly weakening the negative impact of temperature volatility on food security (P<0.01) and significantly enhancing the positive impact of precipitation volatility on food security (P<0.01). (3) There were regional differences in the impact of climate change on food security and the role of agricultural insurance. The fluctuation of temperature had a negative impact on food security in the south, while the fluctuation of precipitation had a significant promoting effect on food security in the north (P<0.05). The moderating effect of agricultural insurance could significantly weaken the negative impact of temperature fluctuations on food security (P<0.01). From the perspective of grain functional areas, the regression coefficients of the impact of temperature volatility on food security in main grain production areas, main sales areas and production sales balance areas were 0.0085, 0.0012 and 0.0421, respectively. The negative impact on the grain production sales balance area was the greatest (P<0.05). Agricultural insurance had the strongest moderating effect in main grain producing areas, which could simultaneously weaken the adverse effects of temperature (P<0.01) and precipitation volatility (P<0.05) on food security.

Key words: Food security, Climate change, Agricultural insurance, Heterogeneity