中国农业气象 ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (07): 527-537.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2022.07.002

• 农业生态环境栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

利用线性和非线性耦合方式建立温室温湿度预测模型

蔡淑芳,林营志,吴宝意,郑东海,雷锦桂   

  1. 福建省农业科学院数字农业研究所,福州 350003
  • 收稿日期:2021-09-28 出版日期:2022-07-20 发布日期:2022-07-20
  • 通讯作者: 雷锦桂,研究员,研究方向为数字农业. E-mail:71906244@qq.com
  • 作者简介:蔡淑芳,E-mail: csf2019@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    福建省自然科学基金项目(2020J011377);福建省科协项目(闽科协学〔2021〕9号);福建省农业科学院项目(CXTD2021013-1)

Greenhouse Temperature and Humidity Prediction Models Based on Linear and Nonlinear Coupling Methods

CAI Shu-fang, LIN Ying-zhi, WU Bao-yi, ZHENG Dong-hai, LEI Jin-gui   

  1. Institute of Digital Agriculture, Fujian Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Fuzhou 350003, China
  • Received:2021-09-28 Online:2022-07-20 Published:2022-07-20

摘要: 基于蔬菜种植试验温室内温度、相对湿度和光照强度的实测数据,根据ARIMA模型和RBF神经网络对线性和非线性问题的预测能力差异,构建ARIMA-RBF神经网络权重组合的温湿度预测模型,对温室内温度和湿度的动态变化进行预测,并比较各模型预测精度。结果表明:温室内温湿度分别具有更明显的线性和非线性变化特征,对应预测性能较好的单一模型分别为ARIMA模型和RBF模型。相较单一模型,ARIMA-RBF神经网络权重组合模型的预测精度更高、稳定性更好。最佳温度组合模型的MAE、MAPE和RMSE分别为1.04℃、2.95%和1.21℃;最佳湿度组合模型的MAE、MAPE和RMSE分别为0.35个百分点、0.36%和0.55个百分点。权重组合模型通过适当的加权策略充分发挥了单一模型对数据不同特征的处理能力,能较好地评估温室内温湿度状态,可为建立更具普适性的温室环境因子模型提供参考。

关键词: 温室, 温度, 湿度, 模型, ARIMA, RBF

Abstract: In order to provide reference for vegetable growth management and environmental optimization regulation, the dynamic changes of greenhouse temperature and humidity were predicted by using ARIMA model and RBF neural network. In this study, the data from July 28 to 29 were taken as the validation set, and the data from the previous 5 to 25 days were taken as the sample set. Three input variables were set to explore the temperature and humidity model prediction effects. Based on the measured data of air temperature, relative humidity and light intensity in the vegetable greenhouse, and according to the difference in the predictive ability of ARIMA model and RBF neural network for linear and nonlinear problems, temperature and humidity prediction models based on weight combination of ARIMA and RBF neural network were constructed. The results showed that the temperature and humidity in the greenhouse had more obvious linear and nonlinear variation characteristics, respectively, and the single models with better prediction effects were the ARIMA model and the RBF model. The optimal single temperature model was the model ARIMA(0,1,1)(1,1,1) 24 with 25 days sample set. The optimal single humidity model was the RBF model (3-6-2) with 25 days sample set and input variable A (temperature, humidity and light intensity). Compared with the optimal single models, the ARIMA-RBF neural network weight combination model had higher prediction accuracy and better stability. The MAE, MAPE and RMSE were 1.04℃, 2.95%, 1.21℃ for the optimal temperature combination model and 0.35 percentage point, 0.36%, 0.55 percentage point for the optimal humidity combination model. The weight combination model gives full play to the ability of single models to process data from different characteristics through an appropriate weighting strategy, and can better evaluate the temperature and humidity status in the greenhouse, which provides a reference for establishing a more universal greenhouse environmental factor model.

Key words: Greenhouse, Temperature, Humidity, Model, ARIMA, RBF