中国农业气象 ›› 2023, Vol. 44 ›› Issue (05): 361-371.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2023.05.002

• 农业生态环境栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于Meta分析施肥与灌溉对夏玉米干旱的缓解效应及其影响因素

刘忠贤,姚嫚,杨再强,张琪,俞昕   

  1. 1. 南京信息工程大学应用气象学院,南京 210044;2. 南京信息工程大学气象灾害预报预警与评估协同创新中心/江苏省农业气象重点实验室,南京 210044
  • 收稿日期:2022-05-06 出版日期:2023-05-20 发布日期:2023-05-17
  • 通讯作者: 张琪,副教授,研究方向为农业气象灾害风险评估。 E-mail:zhangq861206@126.com
  • 作者简介:刘忠贤,E-mail:1303266208@qq.com
  • 基金资助:
    国家自然科学基金项目(41977410);国家重点研发计划课题(2019YFC1510205)

Alleviation Effect of Fertilization and Irrigation on Summer Maize Drought and its Influencing Factors Based on Meta-analysis

LIU Zhong-xian, YAO Man, YANG Zai-qiang, ZHANG Qi, YU Xin   

  1. 1. College of Applied Meteorology, Nanjing University of Information Science and Technology, Nanjing 210044, China; 2. Collaborative Innovation Center on Forecast and Evaluation of Meteorological Disasters, Nanjing University of Information Science & Technology/ Jiangsu Key Laboratory of Agricultural Meteorology, Nanjing 210044
  • Received:2022-05-06 Online:2023-05-20 Published:2023-05-17

摘要: 通过文献检索共获得56篇夏玉米干旱试验文献,其中施肥26篇、灌溉30篇,以不采取任何措施为对照,采用Meta分析方法探究施肥和灌溉对夏玉米干旱的缓解效应及其影响因素。结果显示:在干旱胁迫下,与不采取措施相比,施肥和灌溉均可显著增加夏玉米产量,增产率分别为19.30%和25.19%。施用不同类型肥料对干旱的缓解效应不同,施用大量元素肥和微量元素肥分别可以提高夏玉米产量20.55%和10.10%,提高效果均达到显著;大量元素肥中氮肥最为常用,其中施用控释尿素的效果最好,干旱情况下可使夏玉米产量提高31.63%,常规尿素分次施入的效果次之,增产率为20.73%,常规尿素全部基施增产率最低,仅为11.69%,且在315kg·hm−2的施氮量范围内,夏玉米增产率与施氮量呈正相关关系;土壤容重和有机质含量也对干旱情况下的施肥效果有影响,在低容重和高有机质含量的土壤上,施肥效果更好;当种植密度较高时,施肥对夏玉米干旱的缓解效果降低,但并不显著。在夏玉米不同生育阶段发生干旱胁迫时,灌溉的缓解效果不同,当全生育期持续干旱时,灌溉缓解效果最好,增产率可达42.98%;抽雄−灌浆期发生干旱时,灌溉的缓解效果优于其他生育阶段;土壤容重和有机质含量对灌溉效果影响显著,土壤容重越低、有机质含量越高,灌溉对夏玉米干旱的缓解效果越好;种植密度也对灌溉效果有影响,密植时缓解效果有所下降;对于不同的夏玉米品种,灌溉对旱敏感品种的缓解效果显著优于耐旱品种。综上,施肥和灌溉均能显著缓解夏玉米干旱,施肥的效果受肥料类型和施用方式影响较大,控释肥料的施用效果更优;在夏玉米需水关键期通过灌溉缓解干旱最为直接有效;两种夏玉米干旱缓解措施的效果均受土壤性质、种植密度的影响,且在不同土壤容重和不同种植密度下,灌溉的缓解效果均优于施肥,具体实施时需结合这些因素综合考虑。

关键词: 施肥, 灌溉, 夏玉米, 产量, Meta分析

Abstract: A Meta study was conducted to quantitative analysis on alleviating effects and influencing factors of summer maize drought by fertilization and irrigation, and to provide a theoretical basis for dealing with summer maize drought disaster. A total of 56 literatures on summer maize drought experiment were obtained through literature search, including 26 literatures on fertilization and 30 literatures on irrigation. Taking no measures as the control, Meta-analysis was conducted to investigate the alleviating effects and its influencing factors of fertilization and irrigation on summer maize drought. The results showed that: under drought stress, fertilization and irrigation significantly increased summer maize yield by 19.30% and 25.19%, respectively, compared with no measures. Different types of fertilizer had different alleviating effects on drought. Applying constant fertilizer and trace fertilizer could increase summer maize yield by 20.55% and 10.10%, respectively. Nitrogen fertilizer is the most commonly used of the constant fertilizers, among them, the application of controlled urea had the best effect, which could increase summer maize yield by 31.63% under the condition of drought, followed by the application of conventional urea in batches, with the yield increase rate of 20.73%, and the yield increase rate of conventional urea by all base application was the lowest, which was only 11.69%. In the range of 315kg·ha−1 N application amount, the yield increase rate of summer maize was positively correlated with the N application amount. Soil bulk density and organic matter content also have an impact on the fertilization effect under drought conditions, and the fertilization effect was better on soils with low bulk density and high organic matter content. When planting density was higher, the alleviating effect of fertilization on summer maize drought decreased, but was not significant. When drought stress occurred in different growth stages of summer maize, the alleviating effect of irrigation was different. When drought continued in the whole growth period, the alleviating effect of irrigation was the best, and the yield increase rate reached 42.98%. The effect of irrigation on alleviating drought in tasseling-grouting stage was better than that in other growth stages. Soil bulk density and organic matter content had significant influence on irrigation effect, the lower soil bulk density and the higher organic matter content, the better alleviating effect of irrigation on summer maize drought. The planting density also had an effect on the irrigation effect, and the alleviating effect of dense planting decreased. For different summer maize varieties, the alleviating effect of irrigation on drought-sensitive cultivars was significantly better than drought-tolerant cultivars. In conclusion, both fertilization and irrigation could significantly alleviate drought of summer maize. The effect of fertilization was greatly affected by fertilizer type and the method of application, and the application effect of controlled fertilizer was better. Irrigation is the most direct and effective way to alleviate drought during the critical water-demanding period of summer maize. The effects of the two drought mitigation measures for summer maize were affected by soil properties and planting density, and the alleviating effect of irrigation was better than fertilization under different soil bulk density and planting density , and these factors should be considered in the specific implementation.

Key words: Fertilization, Irrigation, Summer maize, Yield, Meta-analysis