中国农业气象 ›› 2012, Vol. 33 ›› Issue (03): 468-472.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2012.03.023

• 论文 • 上一篇    下一篇

有关天气气候征兆预报法中“百日后降雨”说法的数学验证

王昌忠,柯资能   

  1. 中国科学技术大学科技史与科技考古系,合肥230026
  • 收稿日期:2012-01-13 出版日期:2012-08-20 发布日期:2012-08-27
  • 作者简介:王昌忠(1987-),山东邹城人,硕士,研究方向为科学技术史。Email:czwang@mail.ustc.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
    “十二五”国家重大科技专项(2012ZX10004301-609)

Mathematical Verification of“Rain After 100 Days”in “Prediction Method of Weather-Climate Sign”

WANG Chang zhong,KE Zi neng   

  1. Department of History of Science and Technology and Archaeometry,University of Science and Technology of China,Hefei230026,China
  • Received:2012-01-13 Online:2012-08-20 Published:2012-08-27

摘要: 利用北京台站1951-2010年的逐日气象资料(包括降水量、最大风速及其风向),对文献\[3\]提出的“天气气候征兆预报法”进行验证。文献\[3\]提出根据3种征兆,即“西南风或南风”、“风力3级以上”、“没有降雨”来预报未来100±5d的降水情况的方法,据称,该方法准确率达93%以上。验证结果表明,根据文献\[3\]的条件,100±3d内降水准确率为77.0%,100±5d内降水准确率为84.7%,结果与文献\[3\]接近。进一步弱化文献\[3\]中设定的条件表明,无需这些条件,任一组±3d降水准确率均为77.0%左右,说明文献\[3\]中的3项征兆与“百日后降雨”没有必然关联。北京台站60a的实际降水概率与征兆法预报“百日后降雨”准确率比较接近,说明文献\[3\]揭示的是北京的客观降水概率,与“征兆”无密切关联。

关键词: 长期天气预报, 降水, “天气气候征兆预报法”

Abstract: Based on the daily meteorological data(1951 to 2010)including precipitation,maximum wind speed and direction of Beijing meteorological station,authors tested the method of“Prediction Method of Weather-Climate Sign”〖JP2〗proposed by reference \[3\].The method could predict precipitation before 100±5 days due to three factors“souther or southwester”,“wind force is grade 3 or better”,“there is no rain”and it was argued that the rate of accuracy of precipitation was above 93%.The results showed that under the factors in reference \[3\],the rate of accuracy of precipitation was 77.0% within 100±3 days and 84.7% within 100±5 days which is basically consistent with the conclusion of reference \[3\].Further evaluation showed that the rate of accuracy of precipitation was also about 77.0% within 3 days in any group without these factors after they were weakened.This means that there is no necessary connection between“rain after 100 days”and these three factors.The actual precipitation probability of 60 years was closed to the rate of accuracy of precipitation of“rain after 100 days”,it seemed that what was showed in reference\[3\]was the actual precipitation probability and there was no strong correlation with“Prediction Method of Weather-Climate Sign”.

中图分类号: