Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology ›› 2022, Vol. 43 ›› Issue (10): 773-785.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2022.10.001

    Next Articles

Effects of Approaches to Estimating Light Extinction Coefficient on Simulating Light Utilization in Maize Canopy

WANG Jun-hao, GU Sheng-hao, XU Tian-jun, CHEN Bo, WEN Wei-liang, ZHANG Li-zhen, GUO Xin-yu   

  1. 1. Information Technology Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences/National Engineering Research Center for Information Technology in Agriculture, Beijing 100097, China; 2. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, China Agricultural University, Beijing 100193; 3. Maize Research Center, Beijing Academy of Agriculture and Forestry Sciences, Beijing 100097; 4. College of Resources and Environmental Sciences, Jilin Agricultural University, Changchun 130118
  • Received:2021-12-16 Online:2022-10-20 Published:2022-10-21

Abstract: A field experiment for the AD268 with large leaf and dwarf structure and the XY335 with small leaf and high structure at three planting densities of low (3 plants·m−2), medium (6 plants·m−2) and high (9 plants·m−2) was conducted. This study integrated the vertical distribution of canopy photosynthetically active radiation (PAR), a 3D canopy model, and a canopy photosynthesis model to analyze responses of the extinction coefficients estimated by the logarithmic approach (klog) and the regression approach (knls) to cultivar and density and their differences, and to evaluate the effects on simulating canopy light utilization. The results showed that there was a difference between klog and knls, and this difference was more obvious for AD268 and aggravated with increasing density. The fitness based on knls for canopy light distribution (R2=0.86) was better than klog (R2=0.77). The daily CO2 assimilation, above-ground dry matter accumulation and radiation use efficiency of AD268 simulated by klog and knls did not differ significantly at low densities, but the difference became larger with increasing density. The critical densities at which the difference become larger were 0.7-2.5plants·m−2.

Key words: Crop model, Parameter estimation, Radiation use efficiency, High photosynthetic efficiency, Ideotype