中国农业气象 ›› 2026, Vol. 47 ›› Issue (3): 353-363.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2026.03.004

• 农业生物气象栏目 • 上一篇    下一篇

基于年型构建伊宁薰衣草始花期预报模型

马玉平,沈伟,周林义,毛炜峄,伊里亚尔·叶克木江,吾米提·居马太,郭贵明, 美丽侃·克尔买买提,张晓蕾   

  1. 1. 伊犁州气象局,伊宁 835000;2. 宿迁市气象局,宿迁 223800;3. 南京气象科技创新研究院,南京 210000;4. 中国气象局乌鲁木齐沙漠气象研究所,乌鲁木齐 830002;5. 新疆乌兰乌苏生态与农业气象野外科学观测研究站/乌兰乌苏农业气象试验站,乌鲁木齐 830002
  • 收稿日期:2025-02-13 出版日期:2026-03-20 发布日期:2026-03-17
  • 作者简介:马玉平,E-mail:ynmyp@163.com
  • 基金资助:
    新疆气象局引导性计划项目(YD2024004);江苏省气象局面上课题项目(KM202416);新疆“三农”骨干人才培养项目(2022SNGGNT003);中国沙漠气象科学研究基金项目(Sqj2024008)

Forecasting Model for Initial Flowering Period of Lavender in Yining Based on Year−type Classification

MA Yu-ping, SHEN Wei, ZHOU Lin-yi, MAO Wei-yi, YILIYAER Yekemujiang,WUMITI Jumatai, GUO Gui-ming, MEILIKAN Kermaimaiti, ZHANG Xiao-lei   

  1. 1. Ili Meteorological Bureau, Yining 835000, China; 2. Suqian Meteorological Bureau, Suqian 223800; 3. Nanjing Innovation Institute for Atmospheric Sciences, Nanjing 210000; 4. Institute of Desert Meteorology, China Meteorological Administration, Urumqi 830002; 5. Field Scientific Experiment Observation Research Station on Ecology and Agrometeorology of Wulanwusu in Xinjiang/ Agrometeorological Experiment Station of Wulanwusu, Urumqi 830002
  • Received:2025-02-13 Online:2026-03-20 Published:2026-03-17

摘要:

准确预报薰衣草始花期对优化花田管理、服务旅游观光及促进伊宁旅游业发展具有重要实践意义。基于伊宁市园艺场2001-2024年薰衣草始花期观测数据及同期2-5月气象资料,分析薰衣草始花期与气象因子的相关性。运用模糊聚类法划分薰衣草开花前的年型,利用通径分析法解析气象因子对薰衣草始花期的直接和间接效应,结合薰衣草生物学特性,筛选薰衣草始花期预报因子;采用多元回归法建立伊宁薰衣草始花期不划分年型和划分年型预报模型,通过薰衣草始花期实际观测数据对预报模型进行精度评价。结果表明:(1)2001-2024年伊宁薰衣草始花期与2月下旬、3月上旬、3月中旬平均气温、2月上旬降水量、开春日-5月31日活动积温显著相关,温度因子的作用大于降水量,活动积温对薰衣草始花期的影响大于旬尺度的温度、降水量、日照时数等气象因子;开春日至5月310℃活动积温对薰衣草始花期贡献度最大,是主导花期预报的关键因子,建立的3个薰衣草始花期预报模型具有统计学意义且通过显著性检验。(2)以划分年型的薰衣草始花期预报模型预报2001-2024年薰衣草始花期,其平均误差0.5d,均方根误差0.8d,相对误差0.6%,较未分年型的薰衣草始花期预报模型精度(平均误差0.9d,均方根误差1.2d,相对误差0.9%)均有提高。建议采用基于气候年型分类的薰衣草始花期模型开展相关预报服务。

关键词: 薰衣草, 气象条件, 年型划分, 花期预报

Abstract:

Accurate prediction of the initial flowering period (IFP) of lavender is essential for optimizing field management and enhancing tourism services in Yining of Xinjiang. Based on the observed data of IFP from 2001 to 2024 at the Yining horticultural station and the meteorological data from February to May of the same period, the correlations between the IFP and meteorological factors were analyzed. Building on the biological characteristics of lavender, preflowering climatological year types were classified via fuzzy clustering, and meteorological pathways were analyzed using path analysis to identify key predictors. Subsequently, multiple linear regression models were developed and validated. The results showed that: (1) significant correlations were observed between IFP and meteorological factors such as the average temperatures in late February, early March, and mid−March, precipitation in early February, and accumulated growing degree−days (GDD0 ) from the start of spring to May 31. GDD0 had the greatest influence, surpassing both precipitation and decadal scale variables. This dominance of GDD0 as a predictor was consistent and statistically significant (P<0.01) across all year−type classifications. (2) The year-type-classified model demonstrated superior accuracy (ME=0.5d, RMSE=0.8d, RE=0.6%) compared to the non-classified model (ME=0.9d, RMSE=1.2d, RE=0.9%). The implementation of the year-type classification model is recommended for operational phenological forecasting. Therefore, it is recommended to adopt the year-type classification–based model for operational forecasting of the IFP of lavender onset in Yining.

Key words: Lavender, Meteorological condition, Year-type classification, Initial flowering period prediction