植物粟对模拟封存CO2泄漏的生理响应

doi:10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2019.06.002

中国农业气象 ›› 2019, Vol. 40 ›› Issue (06): 350-356.doi: 10.3969/j.issn.1000-6362.2019.06.002

植物粟对模拟封存CO₂泄漏的生理响应

纪翔，王玉涛，张雪艳，尹忠东，马欣，韩耀杰

1．喀什大学生命与地理科学学院/叶尔羌绿洲生态与生物资源研究高校重点实验室，新疆喀什 844000；2．中国农业科学院农业环境与可持续发展研究所，北京 100081；3．中国科学院地理科学与资源研究所/中国科学院农业政策中心，北京 100101； 4．北京林业大学水土保持学院，北京 100083

出版日期:2019-06-20 发布日期:2019-06-11
作者简介:纪翔（1992-），女，硕士生，研究方向为气候变化。E-mail：jixiang17306@163.com
基金资助:
国家自然科学基金（31600351）；国家重点技术研究发展计划（2016YFC0500508）；喀什大学研究生科研创新活动基金（XJGRI2017134）

Physiological Response of Plant Millet to Simulated Carbon Capture and Storage of CO₂ Leakage

JI Xiang, WANG Yu-tao, ZHANG Xue-yan, YIN Zhong-dong, MA Xin, HAN Yao-jie

1. The Key Laboratory of Ecology and Biological Resources in Yarkand Oasis at Colleges & Universities under the Department of Education of Xinjiang Uygur Autonomous Region, Kashi University, Kashi 844000, China; 2. Institute of Environment and Sustainable Development in Agriculture, Chinese Academy of Agricultural Sciences, Beijing 100081; 3. Institute of Geographical Science and Natural Resources Research/Center for Chinese Agricultural Policy, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101; 4. Collage of Water and Soil Conservation, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083

Online:2019-06-20 Published:2019-06-11

摘要/Abstract

摘要： 碳捕集与封存（Carbon Capture and Storage，CCS）技术是近年来迅速发展的温室气体减排措施，是以煤为主的中国重要的战略性减排技术之一，减排量巨大。但是，CCS发展备受争议，其泄漏有可能会对周围生态系统尤其是结构单一的农田生态系统造成严重影响。本研究以北方地区主要粮食作物粟为试验对象，自主设计模拟地质封存CO₂泄漏盆栽试验，通过对植物生育期SPAD（叶绿素相对含量）、株高、根系以及产量、穗部特征等指标的观测，分析粟对CCS泄漏的响应。结果表明：（1）受CCS泄漏的影响，植物粟SPAD值显著降低，植株叶片叶绿素含量极显著下降（P＜0.01）。（2）CCS泄漏发生30d后粟的株高显著下降，根分支显著增加，植株受泄漏影响明显。（3）CCS泄漏显著降低了植株地上部干重和鲜重，但是泄漏对地下部鲜重无显著影响，地下部干重较地上部降幅偏小。（4）CCS泄漏影响下，植株粟产量下降34.92%。此外，CCS泄漏下植株穗长、穗粗、总粒重等农艺性状下降显著。

关键词: 粟, CCS泄漏, 生理响应, SPAD, 产量, 封存CO₂

Abstract: Carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology is one of the key strategic emission reduction technologies, which made a great contribution towards emission reductions. However, there still exists controversy of CCS largely due to the safety problems caused by its leakage. Leakage of CO₂ captured in geological structures has a threat to the cultivated crops on the ecosystem suroundings. Thus it has great significance to carry out CCS leakage assessment on crops. In this study, the millet crop, which is the main grain in the northern region, was used as experimental object. Effects of CCS leakage on the physiological characteristics of millet were studied through a self-designed pots experiment simulation CO₂ leakage by analyzing the SPAD, plant height, panicle diameter, panicle length, plant biomass and yield of the millet plant. The results showed that CO₂ leakage into shallow soil caused the decrease significantly for leaf green value (SPAD), fresh weight in the shoot, dry weight in the ground and the weight of the grain ear, which proved that the CO₂ leakage of the storage had a serious negative impact on the physiology and yield of the millet, and the yield of millet decreased by 34.92%. It was also observed that the number of branches of root increased by 10%, and the depth of the root burial became shallower. It indicated that the number of the millet roots has response for CO₂ leakage. Meanwhile, the weight per panicle, the panicle diameter was coarse and the panicle length changed significantly.

Key words: Millet, CCS Leakage, Physiological response, SPAD, Yield, CO2 capture and storage

纪翔，王玉涛，张雪艳，尹忠东，马欣，韩耀杰. 植物粟对模拟封存CO₂泄漏的生理响应[J]. 中国农业气象, 2019, 40(06): 350-356.

JI Xiang, WANG Yu-tao, ZHANG Xue-yan, YIN Zhong-dong, MA Xin, HAN Yao-jie. Physiological Response of Plant Millet to Simulated Carbon Capture and Storage of CO₂ Leakage[J]. Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2019, 40(06): 350-356.

参考文献

[1] 李琦,刘桂臻,蔡博峰,等.二氧化碳地质封存环境风险评估的空间范围确定方法研究[J].环境工程,2018,36(2):27-32. Li Q,Liu G Z,Cai B F,et al.Principle and methodology of determining the spactial range of envrionmental risk assessment of carbon dioxide geological storage[J]. Environmental Engineering,2018,36(2):27-32.(in Chinese) [2] 李琦,蔡博峰,陈帆,等.二氧化碳地质封存的环境风险评价方法研究综述[J].环境工程,2019,37(2):13-21. Li Q,Cai B F,Chen F,et al.Review of environmental risk assessment methods for carbon dioxide geological storage[J]. Environmental Engineering,2019,37(2):13-21.(in Chinese) [3] Bearbien S E,Ciotoli G,Commbs P,et al.The impact of a naturally occurring CO2 gas vent on the shallow ecosystem and soil chemistry of a Mediterranean pasture (Latera,Italy)[J]. Int.J.Greenh.Gas.Control,2008,l2:373-387. [4] Zhang X Y,Ma X,Zhao Z,et al.CO2 leakage-induced vegetation decline is primarily driven by decreased soil O2[J].Journal of Environmental Management,2016,171:225. [5] Dean M,Tucker O.A risk based framework for measurement, monitoring and verification(MRV) of the goldeneye storage complex for the Peterhead CCS project,UK[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2017,61(4):1-15. [6] Wu Y,Ma X,Li Y E,et al.The impacts of introduced CO2 flux on maize/alfalfa and soil[J].International Journal of Greenhouse Gas Control,2014,23(2):86-97. [7] Al-Traboulsi,Sjogersten M,Colls S,et al.Potential impact of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage(CCS) systems on growth and yield in spring field bean[J].Environ.Exp. Bot.,2012,80:43-53. [8] Ko D,Yoo G,Yun S,et al.Impacts of CO2 leakage on plants and microorganisms:a review of results from CO2 release experiments and storage sites[J].Greenhouse Gases Science & Technology,2016,6(3):319-338. [9] Al-Traboulsi M,Sofie Sjögersten, Colls J,et al.Potential impact of CO2 leakage from carbon capture and storage systems on field bean(Vicia faba)[J].Physiologia Plantarum, 2012,146(3):261-271. [10] Pfanz H,Vodnik D,Wittmann C,et al.Photosynthetic performance(CO2-compensation point, carboxylation efficiency, and net photosynthesis) of timothy grass(Phleum pratense L.) is affected by elevated carbon dioxide in post-volcanic mofette areas[J].Environmental & Experimental Botany, 2007,61(1):41-48. [11] Zhang X Y,Ma X,Wu Y,et al.Enhancement of farmland greenhouse gas emissions from leakage of stored CO2:simulation of leaked CO2 from CCS[J].Science of Total Environment,2015,518/519:78-85. [12] 纪翔,马欣,韩耀杰,等.箱体模拟地质封存CO2泄漏速度差异对植物的影响[J].农业工程学报,2018,34(2):242-247. Ji X,Ma X,Han Y J,et al.Effect of different leakage speeds on plants in carbon capture and storage by simulation in chamber[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2018,34(2):242-247. (in Chinese) [13] 李红英,程鸿燕,郭昱,等.谷子抗旱机制研究进展[J].山西农业大学学报(自然科学版),2018,38(1):6-10. Li H Y,Cheng H Y,Guo Y,et al.Progress in the mechanisms of drought tolerance in foxtail millet[J].J.Shangxi Agric, Univ.(Natural Science Edition),2018,38(1):6-10.(in Chinese) [14] Tsai K J,Lu M Y J,Yang K J,et al.Assembling the Setaria italica L.Beauv.genome into nine chromosomes and insights into regions affecting growth and drought tolerance[J]. Scientific Reports,2016,6(1):35076-35086. [15] 伍洋,马欣,李玉娥,等.地质封存CO2泄漏对农田生态系统的影响评估及耐受阈值[J].农业工程学报,2012,28(2): 196-205. Wu Y,Ma X,Li Y E,et al.Impact assessment and tolerable threshold value of CO2 leakage from geological storage on agro-ecosystem[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2012,28(2): 196-205.(in Chinese) [16] 谢晓金,申双和,李映雪,等.高温胁迫下水稻红边特征及SPAD和LAI的监测[J].农业工程学报,2010,26(3):183-190. Xie X J,Shen S H,Li Y X,et al.Red edge characteristics and monitoring SPAD and LAI for rice with high temperature stress[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2010,26(3):183-190.(in Chinese) [17] 马欣,张雪艳,田地,等.大刍草作为地质封存CO2泄漏指示植物的评估[J].农业工程学报,2017,33(18):224-229. Ma X,Zhang X Y,Tian D,et al.Assessment on Zea diploperennis L. as bio-indicator of CO2 leakage from geological storage[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2017,33(18): 224-229.(in Chinese) [18] Zhang X Y,Ma X,Wu Y,et al.A plant tolerance index to select soil leaking CO2 Bio-indicators for carbon capture and storage[J].Journal of Cleaner Production,2017,170(1): 735-741. [19] Li G,Du Y L,Zhao H B.Comparison of stress resistance in several ground covering plants[J].J.Inn.Mong. Agric. Univ.,2011,32:42-47. [20] 刘国一,谢永春,侯亚红,等.温度和二氧化碳浓度升高对青稞生长的影响[J].中国农业气象,2018,39(9):567-574. Liu G Y,Xie Y C,Hou Y H,et al.Effects of elevated temperature and carbon dioxide concentration on the growth of highland barley[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2018,39(9):567-574.(in Chinese) [21] 蔡威威,万运帆,艾天成,等.空气温度和CO2浓度升高对晚稻生长及产量的影响[J].中国农业气象,2015,36(6): 717-723. Cai W W,Wan Y F,Ai T C,et al.Impacts of elevated CO2 concentration and temperature increasing on growth and yield of late rice[J].Chinese Journal of Agrometeorology, 2015,36(6):717-723.(in Chinese) [22] 李天来,陈亚东,刘义玲,等.根际CO2浓度对网纹甜瓜根系生长和活力的影响[J].农业工程学报,2009,25(4):210-215. Li T L,Chen Y D,Liu Y L,et al.Effects of rhizosphere CO2 concentration on root growth and activity of netted muskmelon[J].Transactions of the CSAE,2009,25(4): 210-215.(in Chinese) [23] Stolwijk J A J,Thimann K V.On the uptake of carbon dioxide and bicarbonate by roots,and its influence on growth[J].Plant Physilolgy,1957,32:13-20. [24] 栾素荣,王占廷,李青松.谷子产量与主要农艺性状的灰色关联度分析[J].河北农业科学,2010,14(11):115-116,118. Luan S R,Wang Z T,Li Q S.Grey relational grade analysis on yield and main agronomic characters of foxtail millet[J]. Journal of Hebei Agricultural Sciences,2010,14(11):115-116, 118.(in Chinese)

植物粟对模拟封存CO₂泄漏的生理响应

Physiological Response of Plant Millet to Simulated Carbon Capture and Storage of CO₂ Leakage

PDF (PC)

可视化

摘要/Abstract

引用本文

使用本文

参考文献

相关文章 15

编辑推荐

Metrics

本文评价

[1]	刘园, 刘布春, 梅旭荣. 区域粮食产量因灾损失评估之长江流域灾情-产量模型再检验[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(12): 1114-1126.
[2]	郭波, 杨振, 何文清, 刘家磊. 生物可降解地膜的应用效果及存在问题[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(11): 977-994.
[3]	徐亚楠, 韩燕, 吴玥, 宋吉青, 柳斌辉, 韩伟, 白文波. 叶面喷施磷糖类制剂对冬小麦抗干热风影响的作用[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(11): 995-1008.
[4]	刘园, 刘布春, 梅旭荣, 贺金娜, 陈迪, 韩锐, 朱永昶. 区域粮食产量因灾损失评估之北方五省灾情-产量模型再检验[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(11): 1009-1021.
[5]	陶正达, 赵静娴, 顾荆奕, 郑俊华, 王俊, 汤小红, 陈洪良, 杨大强. 几种分离方法在区域经济作物产量预测上的适用性分析:以吴中区枇杷为例[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(10): 876-888.
[6]	张林, 周登峰, 武文明, 彭晨, 季学勤, 杨太明, 王世济. 安徽沿江地区露地鲜食玉米适宜播期确定[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(10): 903-915.
[7]	向午燕, 白伟, 冯良山, 蔡倩, 张哲, 孙占祥, 冯晨. 播期与开沟深度对春玉米产量和资源利用效率的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(10): 916-928.
[8]	王科捷, 王乐, 冯朋博, 卢圆明, 王晓苹, 柳雅倩, 康建宏, 梁熠. 配施控释尿素对宁南山区春玉米生产的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(09): 769-781.
[9]	贾瑞玲, 赵小琴, 刘军秀, 刘彦明, 张明, 方彦杰, 马宁. 黄土高原半干旱区气候变化对荞麦生产的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(09): 782-794.
[10]	陈佳俊, 史晓亮, 丁皓, 史孟琦. 基于DSSAT模型的关中地区冬小麦单产模拟及其影响因子[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(09): 805-819.
[11]	江晓东, 张建取, 雷虎. 梅雨季节高温高湿环境下调亏灌溉对设施番茄生产的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(08): 685-694.
[12]	项倩, 杨再强, 吴磊, 张建建, 魏伟. 病毒病侵害下番茄叶片SPAD值高光谱估算模型[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(08): 707-720.
[13]	王洪博, 李国辉, 徐雪雯, 黄维雄, 赵泽艺, 高阳, 王兴鹏. 基于AquaCrop模型评估气候变化下棉花生产的可持续性[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(07): 588-598.
[14]	余梦奇, 路梦莉, 张雅婷, 陈志英, 李文阳. 灌浆期高温对玉米叶片光合特性及抗氧化酶活性的影响[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(07): 599-610.
[15]	殷美祥, 罗瑞婷, 朱平, 曾钦文, 招伟文. 基于两种数据集构建广东县级尺度龙眼产量模型效果对比[J]. 中国农业气象, 2023, 44(06): 502-512.